Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 333 - 333
1 Jul 2011
Lautenbach CE
Full Access

I studied 1191 patients with known or suspected bone or joint infection. I divided patients with acute onset infection into three groups based on the speed of onset and the intensity of the infection. I divided the patients with known chronic infection into four groups according to the intensity of the infection. I used clinical and radiological parameters to determine the groups. There was a fifth group of patients with suspected infection who turned out to have other related or similar pathology but who were actually free of infection. The laboratory tests studied were all the parameters constituting a full blood count (CBC), tests of inflammatory activity (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, plasma viscosity and procalcitonin). I also studied the iron profile (serum iron, iron saturation, transferrin and ferritin). The same tests were used to monitor the patient’s progress as they responded to treatment – or not.

Findings: Not surprisingly those patients with the most intensive and extensive infection had disturbances across the spectrum of tests. As the intensity and extent of infection diminished more and more parameters returned to normal. It is thus possible to titrate the systemic effects of infection. Contrary to popular belief the white cell count, differential count and the activity tests can be normal in a large number of patients with recognisable infection. The most subtle evidence of infection is found in the iron profile, namely a diminished serum iron with an elevated ferritin level. Indeed the most definitive indicator of infection is the ratio of ferritin to iron.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 326 - 326
1 Jul 2011
Lautenbach CE
Full Access

I wish to present my experience with 521 patients with infection around hip arthroplasty and 262 with infected knee arthroplasty. The management in each case depends on circumstances such as the period since surgery, the patient’s symptoms, severity of illness and general health, and the condition of the remaining bone stock.

One hundred and thirty hips and 94 knees were managed conservatively i.e. without surgery.

Nine knees and 11 hips had debridement and irrigation without removing the arthroplasty. Infection persisted in 2 knees and 3 hips.

Nine knees were exchanged in one stage. infection persisted in 5. Forty three hips were exchanged in one stage. Infection persisted in 18.

Fifty knees were exchanged in two stages. Infection persisted in 11. One hundred and ninety eight hips were exchanged in two stages. Infection persisted in 28.

Arthrodesis was performed in 77 of the more severely infected and destroyed knees. Infection persisted in 32.

One hundred and eight of the more severely destroyed hips were left as excision arthroplasties. Ten remained infected but comfortable.

Five patients required amputation above the knee and three through the hip.

Two patients sustained serious vascular complications during surgery at the hip and one at the knee.

Four patients in this series died during treatment