Background

The decision to choose CR (cruciate retaining) insert or CS (condylar stabilized) insert during TKA remains a controversial issue. Triathlon CS type has a condylar stabilized insert with an increased anterior lip that can be used in cases where the PCL is sacrificed but a PS insert is not used. The difference of the knee kinematics remains unclear. This study measured knee kinematics of deep knee flexion under load in two insert designs using 2D/3D registration technique.

Background

Various postoperative evaluations using fluoroscopy have reported in vivo knee flexion kinematics under weight bearing conditions. This method has been used to investigate which design features are more important for restoring normal knee function. The objective of this study is to evaluate the kinematics of a Low Contact Stress total knee arthroplasty (LCS TKA) in weight bearing deep knee flexion using 2D/3D registration technique.

Background

Various postoperative evaluations using fluoroscopy have reported in vivo knee flexion kinematics under weight bearing conditions. This method has been used to investigate which design features are more important for restoring normal knee function. The objective of this study is to evaluate the kinematics of a Posterior-Stabilized TKA in weight bearing deep knee flexion using 2D/3D registration technique.

Background

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been developed to achieve lower contact stress and higher conformity compared to fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially the motion of the polyethylene insert (PE) during various daily performances. And the in vivo motion of the PE during stairs up and down has not been clarified. The objective of this study is to clarify the in vivo motion of MB total knee arthroplasty including the PE during stairs up and down.

Background

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been developed to achieve lower contact stress and higher conformity compared to fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially about the kinematics of polyethylene insert (PE). In vivo motion of PE during squatting still remains unclear. The objective of this study is to investigate the in vivo motion of MB total knee arthroplasty including PE during squatting.

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been developed to achieve lower contact stress and higher conformity than fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially about the motion of polyethylene insert (PE). And the in vivo motion of PE during squat motion has not been clarified. The objective of this study is to clarify the in vivo motion of MB total knee arthroplasty including PE during squat motion. Patients and methods: We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 11 knees (10 patients) implanted with PFC-Sigma RPF (DePuy). Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did a wight-bearing deep knee bending motion. And motion between each component was analyzed using two-to three-dimensional registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components, and PE (implanted with four tantalum beads intra-operatively) from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the range of motion between the femoral and tibial components, axial rotation between the femoral component and PE, the femoral and tibial component, and the PE and tibial component, and AP translation of the nearest point between the femoral and tibial component and between the femoral component and PE.

Results: The mean range of hyper-extension was 2.1° and the mean range of flexion of 121.2°. The femoral component relative to the tibial component demonstrated 10.4° external rotation for 0–120 degrees flexion. The tibial component rotated 10.2° externally relative to the PE and the femoral component minimally rotated relative to the PE within ± 5 degrees. In upright standing position, the femoral component already rotated externally relative to the tibial component in 6.3°, and the PE also rotated on average 6.4° externally on the tibial tray. Typically the femoral component relative to the tibial component exhibited a central pivot pattern external rotation from extension to 80° knee flexion. Subsequently from 80 to 120°, bilateral condyles moved backward. In a similar fashion, the femoral component relative to the PE exhibited a central pivot pattern external rotation from extension to 70° knee flexion and subsequently bicondylar rollback from 70 to 120° knee flexion.

Discussion and Conclusion: In this study, we evaluated the in vivo motion of PE during squat motion. About this total knee prosthesis, the mobile-bearing mechanism which advantages over fixed-bearing prosthesis to reduce contact stress and keep high comformity might work well, and arc of range of motion was maintained. Furthermore, in upright standing position, the femoral component and tibial component already rotated externally relative to the PE in almost equal measure. This indicated that, self-aligning mechanism, another characteristic of the MB prosthesis might also work well.

Recently mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become more popular. However, the advantages of mobile bearing (MB) PS TKA still remain unclear especially from a kinematic point of view. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference and advantage in kinematics of mobile baring PS TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) PS TKA.

Femorotibial nearest positions for 19 subjects (20 knees), 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN)with mobile bearing PS TKA, and 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN)with fixed bearing PS TKA were analyzed using the sagittal plane fluoroscopic images. All the knees were implanted by a single surgeon. All the subjects performed weight bearing deep knee bending motion. We evaluated range of motion, axial rotation of the femoral component, AP translation of medial and lateral sides.

The average range of motion between femoral component and tibial component was 119°±18° in MB and 122°±10 ° in FB. The axial rotation of the femoral component was 11.8°±6.2° in MB and 11.8°±4.9° in FB. There was no significant difference both in range of motion and axial rotation between MB and FB. The AP translation of MB and FB showed same patterns. They were rollback in early flexion, the lateral pivot pattern (the medial condyle moved forward significantly compared with the lesser amount of AP translation for the lateral condyle) at mid flexion, and bicondylar rollback at deep flexion. The rollback in early flexion was 3.4mm in MB and 1.8mm in FB at medial side, 4.2mm in MB and 4.8mm in FB at lateral side. There was no significant difference. The lateral pivot pattern, which moved anteriorly, was 7.8mm in MB and 7.0mm in FB at medial side, 3.0mm in MB and 2.4mm in FB at lateral side. There was no significant difference. The bicondylar rollback at deep flexion was 6.4mm in MB and 7.7mm in FB at medial side, 6.9mm in MB and 4.8mm in FB at lateral side. In four subjects, more than 12°axial rotation was observed in knees implanted with FB TKA which allows only 12°axial rotation.

The results in this study demonstrate that there was no significant difference in kinematics of weight bearing deep knee bending motion between MB and FB. The advantage of MB is allowance of axial rotation which restricted until 12° in FB NexGen Legacy flex PS TKA.