Bone ingrowth fixation of large diameter, beaded cobalt chromium cups is generally considered to be reliable but this is typically judged radiographically. To date, implant retrieval data of attached bone has been limited. This study evaluated correlations between the pre-revision radiographic appearance and the measured amount of bone attachment on one design of porous coated cup. Twenty-six monoblock, CoCr Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR, Smith and Nephew, TN, USA) cups with macroscopic beads and hydroxyapatite coating were studied. Seventeen were revised for acetabular malposition with the remainder revised for femoral loosening (4), pain (1), infection (1), dislocation (1) or lysis (2). Median time to revision was 35 months (10 – 70 months). Ten patients were female; the median age of all patients was 54 years. The pre-revision radiographs were visually ranked for cup-bone integration as follows: 0 = none, 1 = < 50%, 2 = 50 – 75%, 3 = 76 – 95%, 4 = > 96% integration. Rankings were made for the superior and inferior aspects, without knowledge of the appearance of bone on the retrievals. The revised cups were photographed at an angle so the dome and the cup periphery were visualized. The area of bone in four equal segments in each of the superior and inferior aspects was measured with image analysis software. A probe was used to differentiate bone from soft tissue. Only bone that covered the beads was counted. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the radiographic and image analysis data. Radiographically, most cups were assessed as having more than 50% of bone attachment and 7 cups were ranked as having almost total integration with bone. Only 2 cups were assessed radiographically as fully loose. Measured total bone attachment ranged from none to 55%. Superior and inferior percent ingrowth were highly correlated (corr=0.68, p<0.001) but there was no correlation between percent bone and x-ray rank (inferior corr=0.01, p=0.96; superior corr=0.23, p=0.26). There was no correlation between cup malpositioning as a reason for revision and x-ray integration ranking (superior p=0.34; inferior p=0.80).Methods
Results
