Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) occurs in 5% to 30% of patients whether or not the patella has been resurfaced. We retrospectively reviewed our patients, none of whom underwent patellar resurfacing. Only 2% had anterior knee pain, none requiring revision surgery. Our follow-up was between two and five years.

We paid particular attention to removing osteophytes and conducting a thorough peripatellar synovectomy and a circumpatellar cautery denervation.

Our results compare favourably to those in the literature, whether or not the patellae were resurfaced. We conclude that patellar resurfacing in TKA is unnecessary when careful attention is paid to the peripatellar tissues.

Many authors believe that patellar resurfacing decreases the incidence of anterior knee pain. We analysed the results of 98 of our own patients (103 knees).

Over the past two years, we performed total knee arthroplasty on 23 men (one bilateral) and 75 women (four bilateral). None of the patellae were replaced, but we carefully removed osteophytes, debrided the patella, and performed a thorough peripatellar synovectomy and circumpatellar cautery denervation. All patients on our database were telephoned, and those who reported pain were examined independently by a consultant and a registrar. If there was any controversy about the site of the pain, a third surgeon saw the patient.

No patient had pain severe enough to warrant revision surgery. Only two (2%) had anterior knee pain, and in neither of them was it marked.

We do not know whether our favourable results are attributable to the peripatellar synovectomy and/or circumpatellar cautery denervation. While we concede that a control study of patients who have undergone patellar resurfacing might be necessary before a firm conclusion can be drawn, we question whether, with such a low incidence of patellar problems, this is ethically justifiable.