header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 403 - 403
1 Oct 2006
Krishnan SP Skinner JA Carrington RWJ Bentley G
Full Access

Introduction and aim: Several authors have suggested that hyaline repair tissue following autologous – chondrocyte implantation (ACI) gives better clinical results than either mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage or fibrocartilage alone. This data is based on the use of periosteum as a covering membrane in these previous studies. We have for some years been using a porcine collagen type 1/III membrane (ACI-C) instead of periosteum and have now the opportunity to analyze the clinical results when compared with the histology of the repaired defect. We have also analysed the influence on the result of age and sex of the patient, the etiology of the lesion, the duration of the knee symptoms, number of previous knee procedures, the site and size of defect and the preoperative functional scores.

Method: Until 2004, 234 patients underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation at our centre. The patients were assessed clinically by their modified Cincinnati scores prospectively from 1 to 4 years from surgery. Also at arthroscopy (1 to 3 years following ACI-C) they underwent biopsy of the implant where possible and the neo-cartilage was graded as hyaline (H), mixed fibrohyaline (F.H), fibrocartilagenous (F.C) and fibrous (F).

Results: The clinical results showed that older patients had poorer results (p< 0.001) and a high preoperative modified Cincinnati score predicted a good result (p< 0.001). Concerning the cause of the defect, the percentage of patients with excellent and good results were significantly low among those with previously failed ACIs and mosaicplaties (12.5%) compared with those following trauma, osteochondritis dessicans and chondromalacia patellae (67% to 77%). At 4 year follow-up, 75% of patients with hyaline neo-cartilage had excellent and good modified Cincinnati scores whereas those with mixed fibro-hyaline and fibro-cartilage had fewer excellent and good results (44.4% and 54.5% respectively). The other parameters such as gender, the site of defect, duration of knee symptoms and the number of previous procedures and the size of the defect did not significantly influence the outcome. In conclusion, patients most likely to benefit from autologous chondrocyte implantation using a collagen membrane (ACI – C) are younger patients with higher preoperative functional scores and those who develop hyaline neo-cartilage.