The number of revisions of total knee replacements (TKR) increases annually. Because of reduced bone stock, stable fixation of the implant is important. The femoral and tibial components are usually cemented whereas stems can be placed either cemented or press-fit (hybrid construct). To assess the stability of revision TKR with either cemented or hybrid places implants a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was executed, by using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The short-term results of this RCT showed no differences between the two groups in stability and clinical outcomes. Although there were no clinical or radiological signs of loosening, both groups showed implants micromotion > 1 mm or degree. These findings might indicate the possibility of loosening later in time; therefore, the current study investigated the stability of cemented versus hybrid-placed revision TKR 6.5 years after surgery. Additionally, clinical results were evaluated. Of the 32 patients in the original RCT, 23 (12 cement, 11 press-fit) were available for mid-term follow-up measures. RSA images taken at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively were used from the previous study. New RSA images were taken at median 6.5 years (range 5.4–7.3) postoperatively. Stability of the femoral and tibial implants was assessed by using model-based RSA software (RSAcore, Leiden, The Netherlands) to determine micromotion. Clinical results were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), active flexion, and VAS pain and satisfaction. Stability and clinical outcome were compared between the two groups using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests when applicable.Introduction
Methods
Total ankle arthroplasty is an accepted alternative to arthrodesis of the ankle. However, complication and failure rates remain high compared to knee and hip arthroplasty. Long-term results of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) are limited, with variable complication and failure rates observed. This prospective study presents the long-term survivorship and the postoperative complications of the STAR prosthesis. Additionally, clinical outcomes and radiographic appearance were evaluated. Between May 1999 and June 2008, 134 primary total ankle arthroplasties were performed using the STAR prosthesis in 124 patients. The survivorship, postoperative complications and reoperations were recorded, with a minimum follow-up period of 7.5 years. Clinical results were assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the Kofoed score. The presence of component migration, cysts and radiolucency surrounding the prosthesis components, heterotopic ossifications and progression of osteoarthritis in adjacent joints were determined.Background
Methods
Ankle arthroplasty is increasingly used to reduce pain and improve or maintain joint mobility in end-stage ankle arthritis. Both treatments show similar results with regard to functional outcome scores and sport related activities. However, the rates of complications and reoperations were higher after ankle replacement. Particularly for the first implant designs, with more promising results for newer designs. One of these newer designs is the Mobility Total Ankle System. Short term results in recent literature describe an improvement of functional outcomes; however complication rates vary widely, ranging from 9 to 37% and the 4-year survival rates ranging between 84 and 98 percent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic short term results of the Mobility prosthesis. Between March 2008 and September 2013, 67 primary total ankle arthroplasties with the Mobility prosthesis were performed, in 64 patients, by one experienced foot and ankle surgeon. Complications, reoperations, failures and the survival rate were retrospectively examined. Patient reported outcomes were assessed with the use of the FFI score and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Prosthesis alignment was measured on the first weightbearing radiographs of the ankle according to the procedure described by Rippstein et al.1 (Fig. 1).Background
Methods
To improve implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced as alternative for conventional instrumentation (CI). Though the PSI technique offers interesting opportunities in TKA, there is no consensus about the effectiveness of PSI in comparison with CI and results concerning soft-tissue balancing remain unclear. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to investigate the varus-valgus laxity in extension and flexion in patients receiving a TKA using PSI compared with CI. Additionally, radiological, clinical and functional outcomes were assessed. In this prospective randomization controlled trial, 42 patients with osteoarthritis received a Genesis II PS (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee), with either PSI (Visionaire, Smith & Nephew) or CI (Smith & Nephew). Patients visited the hospital preoperative and postoperative after 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months. One-year postoperative varus-valgus laxity was measured in extension and flexion on stress radiographs. Additional assessments included: the hip-knee-ankle angle on long-leg radiographs, femoral and tibia component rotation on CT-scans, radiolucency, the Knee Society Score (KSS), VAS pain, VAS Satisfaction, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS), Patella score (Kujala), the University of California Los Angeles activity score (UCLA), the anterior-posterior laxity in 20° and 90° knee flexion, adverse events and complications. The outcome measures were compared using independent t-tests, non-parametric alternatives and repeated measurements, with a significance level of p<0.05.Background
Methods
