We have analyzed the long-term clinical and radiological results of 169 total knee replacements(TKRs) for rheumatoid arthritis over 10 years. The average follow up period was 12.8(10–17.6) years.

The flexion contracture was improved from average 25.0 to 2.9 degrees. But the angle of great flexion had decreased from average 128.0 to 114.7 degrees. At the final follow up, the American Knee Society knee score was 87.5 and function score 76.5 in average. The revision arthroplasty was performed in 20 cases, but only 4 cases were done before 10 years after the primary TKRs. The survival rate of the implant was 97.9% at 10 years and 85.3% at 14 years in Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis. But just after 10 years, problems such as osteolysis and periprosthetic fractures started to occur increasingly. 10-year follow up results is just the 10-year results only, not the long-term or final results of TKRs for rheumatoid arthritis.

Purpose: We have performed this study to compare the postoperative maximal flexion angle(MFA) of high-flex implants with that of conventional implants in PCL-substituted total knee arthroplasty(TKA).

Materials and Methods: The staged sequential bilateral TKAs were performed in Group 1, 35 patients(70 knees) with osteoarthritis of both knee. The conventional implant and the high-flex implant were both used in each patient by randomized method. The postoperative MFA of both type of implants was measured and analyzed at 1 year after surgery. To evaluate unidentified factors that might influence the results, such as the differences derived from personal characteristics during postoperative rehabilitation process achieving the range of motion of knee, we also analyzed the other patient groups, which were composed of Group 2(10 patients, 20 knees) bilaterally operated with conventional implants, Group 3(7 patients, 14 knees) bilaterally with high-flex implants, Group 4(13 patients, 13 knees) unilaterally with conventional implants and Group 5(17 patients, 17 knees) unilaterally with high-flex implant.

Results: In Group 1, the average postoperative MFA of high-flex implant and that of conventional implant showed no significant difference.(131.7 and 131.9 degree each) The average postoperative MFA in Group 1,2,3,4 and 5 showed no significant difference either.

Conclusion: This study indicates that the high-flex implant alone does not seem to improve the MFA as compared to the conventional implant. The status of the contralateral knee and the personal characteristics during rehabilitation seem to be more important factors in increasing the maximal flexion.