Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 190 - 190
1 Mar 2008
Park Y Park S Kim YY Yoon Y
Full Access

In the cementless total hip arthroplasty, the position of the stem is pretty much determined by broach and rasping with which the is required for two reasons: one is to align the stem with the femur at the desired position and the orientation. The other is to achieve the conformity between the stem and the prepared proximal cavity surface in the femur. The robotic hip surgery can be a solution for the accurate of femoral canal shaping, but recent reports about the clinical follow-up study of the robotic hip surgery indicated frequent dislocation mainly due to the excessive soft tissue damage during robotic operation. In this paper, a guide being inserted into the femoral canal is proposed to restrict the undesired motion of the rasp inside the femur without extra incision.

A set of canal guide and custom rasp for the selected stem(versys fibermetal midcoat, zimmer co.)were developed and tested with 4 synthetic femurs (model 1130, Sawbones co.). After rasping, a plastic copy of the stem was inserted into the femur and sliced at 5 mm thickness. From obtained cross sections, percentages of the gap larger than 0.3mm between the stem and the bone was measured. 6_C_Results: In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut.

In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut.

The conformity of femoral canal with the femoral stem in this approach was higher than the conventional hip surgery and comparable to those in the robotic surgery. The alignment of the stem within the femur is also as good as those in the robotic surgery(0.34±0.67 approach does require neither expensive system nor CT scan. Also this approach can be executed swiftly without extra time and unnecessary large incision compared with the robotic surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 171 - 171
1 Mar 2008
Ko B Park S Yoon Y Kim YY
Full Access

The purpose of this research is to propose CT-free cup orientator using tilt sensors without expensive point tracking devices in total hip replacement. In the case of using a mechanical guide, the accuracy of cup orientation can be sacrificed because of change of the patient’s posture during procedure. Several navigation systems have been introduced to secure an accurate position and orientation of the implant in THR. These systems are expensive and have some weakness due to possible interference inoptical measurement. Our orientator employs a T-bar shaped gauge and economic tilt sensors to secure a fairly orientation of acetabular cup inTHR.

The T-bar gauge having three feet with adjustable distance is designed to obtain the anatomical landmarks concurrently. Each foot is placed on the anatomical landamark of the sawbone. The gauge has its own tilt sensor to identifiy the tilt angle of the guage using AD input board. Similary, the cup positioning tool and dynamic reference base (DRB) have their own tilt sensors. The experimental procedures of CT-free cup orientator are done as follows:

Place the T-bar gauge in right place on the pelvis by setting three feet on the ASIS and pubic.

Attach DRB to pelvis and align its orientation parallel to the T-bargauge.

Align the tilt sensor of the cup positioner parallel to DRB.

We define errors as difference between experimental data and ground truth obtained by Micro-Scribe (Immersion Inc.) Errors of the cup in abduction and anteversion were 1.2 and 1.0 degrees respectively when the test is performed on a sawbone.

We analyzed the causes of error to improve the accuracy of our cup orientator. Measuring landmarks and aligning three tilt sensors seemed to cause some errors. Base on this study, we expect to make an experiment on cadaver.