Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disabling disease depriving the quality of life of patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are recently used to modify the inflammatory and degenerative cascade of the disease. Source of MSCs could change the progression and symptoms of OA due to their different metabolomic activities. We asked whether MSCs derived from the infrapatellar fat (IPF), synovium (Sy) and subcutaneous (SC) tissues will decrease inflammatory and degenerative markers of normal and OA chondrocytes and improve regeneration in culture. Tissues were obtained from three male patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery due to sports injuries after ethical board approval. TNFa concentration decreased in all MSC groups (Sy=156,6±79, SC=42,1±6 and IPF=35,5±3 pg/ml; p=0,036) on day 14 in culture. On day seven (Sy=87,4±43,7, SC=23±8,9 and IPF=14,7±3,3 pg/ml, p=0,043) and 14 (Sy=29,1±11,2, SC=28,3±18,5 and IPF=20,3±16,2 pg/ml, p=0,043), MMP3 concentration decreased in all groups. COMP concentration changes however were not significant. Plot scores of tissues for PC2-13,4% were significantly different. Based on the results of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomics coupled with recent data processing strategies, clinically relevant seven metabolites (L-fructose, a-tocotrienol, coproporphyrin, nicotinamide, bilirubin, tauro-deoxycholic acid and galactose-sphingosine) were found statistically different (p<0.05 and fold change>1.5) ratios in tissue samples. Focusing on these metabolites as potential therapeutics could enhance MSC therapies.
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), either rich (L-PRP) or poor (P-PRP) of leukocytes, is frequently used as an anti-inflammatory and regenerative tool in osteoarthritis (OA). PRP contains proteins but not genes as it is derived from megakaryocytes. Proteomics but not metabolomics of PRP was recently studied. Metabolomics is a field of ‘omics’ research involved in comprehensive portrayal of the small molecules, metabolites, in the metabolome. These small molecules can be endogenous metabolites or exogenous compounds found in an organism (1). Our aim was to determine the difference between L-PRP and P-PRP. A cross-sectional clinical study was designed in six recreational male athletes between the ages of 18 and 35 years. 3 mL P-PRP and 3 mL -LPRP was prepared from 60 mL of venous blood after treating with 9 mL of sodium citrate and centrifugation at 2.700 rpm for 10 min. Half of the prepared PRP's were frozen at −20°C for a week. Fresh and frozen samples were analyzed at the Q-TOF LC/MS device after thawing to room temperature. Untargeted metabolomic results revealed that the metabolomic profile of the L-PRP and P-PRP were significantly different from each other. A total of 33.438 peaks were found. Statistically significant (p<0.05) peaks were uploaded to the MetaboAnalyst 5.0 platform. Exogenous out of 2.308 metabolites were eliminated and metabolites found significant for our study were subjected to pathway analysis. Steroid biosynthesis, sphingolipid metabolism and metabolism of lipid pathways were affected. In the L-PRP samples, Nicotinamide riboside (FC: 2.2), MHPG (FC: 3.0), estrone sulfate (FC: 7.5), thiamine diphosphate (FC: 2.0), leukotriene E4 (FC: 7.5), PC(18:1 (9Z)e/2:0) (FC: 9.8) and Ap4A (FC: 2.1) were higher compared to P-PRP. C24 sulfatide (FC: −11.8), 3-hexaprenyl-4,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (FC: −2.8) metabolites were furthermore lower in P-PRP. Clinical outcomes of PRP application should consider these metabolic pathways in future studies (2).
