Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 36 - 36
1 Jan 2011
Kanabar P Patel A
Full Access

Our aim was to analyse radiological outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated with Philos plate and to assess its usefulness in treatment of malunion and non-union.

Seventy-seven patients were treated with Philos plate (24 men and 53 women). Mean age was 61 years (15–88). There were 66 acute fractures, 6 nonunion, 4 mal-union and one periprosthetic fracture. Acute fractures included 29 two part, 30 three part and five 4 part fractures. Seven had associated dislocation. There were two head splitting fractures. Deltopectoral approach was used in all. No acute fractures were bonegrafted however all nonunions had bonegraft.

Postoperative radiographs were available for review for 59. Average union time was 12 weeks (8–24). Satisfactory union occurred in 51 (86.4%). Twenty-three (39 %) fractures had inadequate reduction. Malplacement of plate was observed in 25 (42%) leading to significant malunion in 11.8%. Satisfactory union was occurred in all of last 30 patients. Nonunion occurred in 2 with infection in one. Other complications included screw penetration into glenohumeral joint, avascular necrosis, screw backing out and tuberosity detachment. Philos plate fixation was used for treatment of 6 nonunions, 4 malunions and one periprosthetic fracture with satisfactory outcome in all.

Relatively high rate of complications was observed in early cases in this series. This could be attributed to the steep learning curve with this technique. Emphasis should be put on careful and adequate reduction of fracture and optimal placement of plate (about 8 mm from the tip of tuberosity) to avoid impingement and to achieve correct screw placement in the humeral head.

In conclusion, Philos plate has been of benefit in management of complex fractures as well as management of non-union of proximal humerus. Quality of reduction and optimal placement of plate appear to be the two most important parameters for a successful outcome.


Historically the management of distal radial fracture has been often inadequate. It can be difficult to internally fix complex distal radial fractures with conventional plates. The fracture often collapses with metalwork failure. Literature suggests that malunion may lead to painful wrist with loss of function. In recent years fixed angle locking plate has been advocated for treatment of complex distal radius fracture. Our aim was to assess to assess the effectiveness of the volar locking plate (DePuy) in maintaining fracture reduction in distal radial fractures.

Radiographs of 170 distal radius fractures treated by the DVR plate were analysed. Fractures were classified according to the Melone and AO classifications. The post injury, intra-operative, 6 weeks postoperative and final postoperative radiographs were reviewed to obtain measurements for radial height, radial slope and volar inclination. The measurements were correlated with fracture pattern, locking screw length, presence or absence of radial styloid screw and plate placement in relation to the wrist joint. The results were analysed statistically using Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Radiologically there was minor loss of radial height, slope and volar inclination but this was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant correlation between complexity of fracture and loss of radiological parameters. There was no statistically significant correlation between loss of radiological parameters and screw length, plate placement or presence or absence of radial styloid screw.

The DVR volar locking plate appears to maintain a satisfactory reduction of the fracture except for some complex fractures with dorsal comminution in which case dorsoradial plates may be preferable.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 382 - 382
1 Jul 2008
Kumar V Kanabar P Owen P Rushton N
Full Access

Background: To analyse the effectiveness and complications of Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS plate) in the management of peri-prosthetic femoral fractures.

Materials and methods: We present a study of 18 peri-prosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty (16 females and 2 male patients) treated with LISS plate between September 2001 to February 2005. The average age of the patients was 81.6 years. Twelve patients had significant co-morbidities pre-operatively. All the fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification for Peri-prosthetic fracture of femur. Ten were classified as type B1, two as type B2 and six as type C. Eleven fractures were around total hip replacement and seven were around hemi-arthroplasty (four cemented and 3 uncemented). Partial weight bearing started early post-operatively. Full weight bearing varied between 5-6 weeks depending on clinical and radiological status. The patients were followed up untill fracture union.

Results: Three patients died during the follow-up period owing to unrelated causes. The average follow up period was 11.7 months. All the remaining fifteen patients had satisfactory fracture union although one patient required further LISS plate following a fall 17 days postoperatively and another one patient developed low grade deep infection with a chronic sinus. It was noted that in one patient, plate had lifted off the bone at the proximal end with no loss of reduction of the fracture. Three patients were noted to have mild to moderate discomfort around the prominent implant. No implant breakage noted.

Conclusions: Even though LISS plate was originally designed for distal femoral fracture treatment, it appears to be very promising device in the treatment of peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (Type B1, Type C and medically unfit patients with Type B2 for stem- revision) with osteoporotic bone in elderly patients. Early mobilization is a key feature. This system involves minimally invasive approach, stable construct without need for primary bone grafting.