Purpose: The functional consequences of femoral nerve resection during soft tissue sarcoma management are not well described. Sciatic nerve resection with a sarcoma, once considered an indication for amputation, is now commonly performed during limb salvage. We compared the functional outcomes of femoral and sciatic nerve resections in patients undergoing wide resection of soft-tissue sarcomas.

Method: The prospectively collected database from a tertiary referral center for sarcomas was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with resection of the femoral or sciatic nerve performed during wide excision of a soft tissue sarcoma. Patient demographics, treatment, complications and functional outcomes were collected.

Results: Ten patients with femoral nerve resections were identified, all women, aged 47 to 78, with large soft tissue sarcomas of varied subtypes. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, most pre-operatively. Six patients developed fractures with long-term follow-up, only two of which were in the prior radiation field. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 1987 scores demonstrated one excellent, 4 good, and 5 fair results. MSTS 1993 scores averaged 71.4 ± 17.2 percent and Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores (TESS) averaged 61.7 ± 21.8. There were no significant differences between the functional scores for patients with femoral or sciatic nerve resections (P=1.0).

Conclusion: Femoral nerve resection appears more morbid than anticipated. The falls to which patients were prone, even years after surgery, subject them to ongoing long-term risks for fractures and other injuries. Nerve-specific functional outcomes should be considered when counseling patients prior possible resection of the femoral nerve for involvement by a soft tissue sarcoma.

Purpose: Few functional outcomes of total femoral endoprosthetic replacement (TFEPR) using contemporary modular systems are available. We compared functional results between TFEPR patients receiving fixed- and rotating-hinge knee componentry following oncologic resections.

Method: Eighteen TFEPR patients were identified from a prospectively gathered sarcoma database. Six were secondary procedures and 12 primary. Four patients had metastatic carcinoma, 8 osteosarcoma, 4 non-osteogenic spindle cell sarcomas of bone, 1 Ewing’s sarcoma, and 1 femur-invading soft-tissue sarcoma. All reconstructions used modular implants from a single company. Proximally, all were bipolar hip hemiarthoplasties, 12 including abductor reattachment. Distally, 8 had fixed- and 10 had rotating-hinge knee componentry. Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and both Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (MSTS) were compared between fixed- and rotating-hinge groups using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Complications included 1 hip dislocation, 1 femoral malrotation, and wound problems requiring 3 debridements and 1 amputation. One metastatic carcinoma patient developed local relapse. Follow-up averaged 4 years (range 1 month to 14 years). At latest follow-up, 10 patients had died of disease. Eight remained alive, 6 disease-free, 2 with distant disease. Among patients surviving 6 months, 6 used no assistive devices, 5 used a single cane, and 4 were wheelchair bound, each at least partly due to distant disease progression. TESS averaged 74.5±17.4, MSTS1987 25.2±4.4; and MSTS1993 58.6±22.9 among the 12 patients for whom functional results were available from latest follow-up. No statistically significant differences or even trends were detected between fixed-hinge and rotating-hinge patients (lowest p = 0.755), but both instability problems were in the rotating-hinge group.

Conclusion: While both rotating- and fixed-hinge TFEPR reconstructions may function well, consideration should be given to fixed-hinge knee reconstruction when massive myectomies or poorer conditioning make hip and knee stability a primary concern in the short-term.