Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 250 - 250
1 May 2006
Jesudason E Jeyem M
Full Access

Introduction Intertrochanteric fractures are common and represent a major source of morbidity and mortality. As with all orthopaedic implants a DHS can fail. One of the most important predictors of failure has been shown to be the Tip-Apex Distance (TAD). An audit was carried to assess the following:

What was our rate of cut out and implant failure?

Where we achieving an acceptable screw position and TAD?

Was there any difference between TAD and grade of surgeon?

Methods An audit of the case notes and x-rays of 54 consecutive patients with hip fractures, treated with DHS, within a twelve-month period were reviewed. Demographic data, grade of surgeon, fracture stability, DHS position, mortality and implant failure were assessed.

Findings Our rate of failure was 2 out of 54 patients, 3.7%. Both of the patients that failed had a TAD of greater than 20mm, and none of the patients with a TAD below 20mm required further surgery. There was no statistical correlation between TAD and grade of operating surgeon.

Recommendations It is paramount importance to ensure that the basic principles of DHS position are well taught to surgical trainees in order to reduce the risk of failure. Following DHS fixation, patients should be followed up for a minimum of 3 months until evidence of radiographic union is evident. DHS failure rates and screw positions should be constantly audited to ensure that failure rates are minimised.