Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 22 - 22
1 Feb 2021
Kamath A Acuna A Jella T Cwalina T Samuel L
Full Access

Introduction

Innovations in orthopaedic technology and infrastructure growth often require significant funding. Although an increasing trend has been observed for third-party investments into medical startups and physician practices, no study has examined the role of this funding in orthopaedics, including the influence of venture capital (VC). Therefore, this study analyzed trends in VC investments related to the field of orthopaedic surgery, as well as the characteristics of companies receiving said investments.

Methods

Venture capital investments into orthopaedic-related businesses were reviewed from 2000–2019 using Capital IQ, a proprietary market intelligence platform documenting financial transactions. The dataset was initially filtered to include healthcare-related venture capital transactions pertaining to the field of orthopaedic surgery. The final list of VC investments and their corresponding businesses were categorized by transaction year, amount (in USD), and orthopaedic subspecialty. The number and sum of VC investments was calculated both annually and cumulatively across the entire study period. Linear regression was used for trend analysis within two distinct, decade-long timeframes (2000–2009 and 2010–2019) and one-way analysis of variance was used to assess differences across orthopaedic subspecialties.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 31 - 31
1 Feb 2021
Acuña A Jella T Barksdale E Samuel L Kamath A
Full Access

Introduction

Although multiple studies have consistently demonstrated that orthopaedic surgeons receive greater transfers of value than other specialties, the industry payments of providers involved in practice guideline formation have not been explored. Therefore, the purpose of our analysis was to evaluate the industry payments among authors of the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

Methods

The publicly available web portal (OrthoGuidelines.org) from the AAOS was queried for all AUCs released over the past decade for the management of musculoskeletal pathologies. For each AUC available through this portal, information related to the AUC and its respective voting members were recorded. We used this information to conduct a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the CMS Open Payments Database. This information was utilized to determine the number of total value of industry payments to AUC voting committee members during the year of voting for AUC criteria. The total amount of industry payment to AUC voting members was calculated, per each AUC, annually, as well as per orthopaedic subspecialty. The average total industry payment per voting member was calculated for each AUC and compared with the average total industry payment per orthopaedic surgeon nationally, in the same year. All descriptive data analyses were performed in Microsoft Excel 2016 (MicrosoftCorp).