Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 18 - 18
1 Apr 2018
Caron M Janssen M Peeters L Surtel D van Rhijn L Emans P Welting T
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

The generation of cartilage from progenitor cells for the purpose of cartilage repair is often hampered by unwanted hypertrophic differentiation of the generated tissue due to endochondral ossification. Continuing on our earlier studies, our goal is to further improve the engineering of hyaline cartilage for the treatment of a cartilage defect in our in vivo model for subperiosteal generation of cartilage, by tuning the differentiation status of the generated cartilage and prevent hypertrophic differentiation. As a healthy cartilage matrix contains high amounts of aggrecan we hypothesise that aggrecan supplementation of the bio-gel used in the generation of the subperiosteal cartilage, mimics the composition of the extracellular matrix environment of cartilage with potential beneficial properties for the engineered cartilage.

METHODS

A 2% (m/v) low melting agarose was injected between the bone and periosteum at the upper medial side of the tibia of both legs of New Zealand white rabbits (DEC 2012–151). The agarose was left unloaded (n=7) or supplemented (n=7) with 2% (w/v) bovine aggrecan (Sigma-Aldrich). After 14 days, rabbits were euthanised. Generated subperiosteal cartilage tissue was analysed for weight, GAG and DNA content. In addition, RT-qPCR and (immuno)histochemistry was performed for key markers of different phases of endochondral ossification.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 78 - 78
1 Apr 2018
Caron M Janssen M Peeters L Surtel D Koole L van Rhijn L Welting T Emans P
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

The generation of cartilage from progenitor cells for the purpose of cartilage repair is often hampered by unwanted ossification of the generated tissue due to endochondral ossification. Our in vitro data show that celecoxib is able to suppress the hypertrophic differentiation phase of endochondral ossification in differentiating human bone marrow stem cells via inhibition of prostaglandin signalling. Continuing on our earlier studies our goal is to further improve the engineering of hyaline cartilage for the treatment of cartilage defects, by determining if celecoxib released from poly(D,L-lactic acid)microspheres is able to prevent unwanted ossification in an in vivo model for the subperiosteal cartilage generation.

METHODS

A 2% (m/v) low melting agarose was injected between the bone and periosteum at the upper medial side of the tibia of both legs of New Zealand white rabbits (DEC 2012–151). The agarose was left unloaded or (n=8) or loaded (n=7) with celecoxib-loaded PGLA microspheres (poly(D,L-lactic acid) microspheres were loaded with 20% (w/w) Celecoxib (Pfizer)). Fourteen days post-injection, rabbits were euthanised. The developed subperiosteal cartilage tissue was analysed for weight, GAG and DNA content. In addition, RT-qPCR and (immuno)histochemistry were performed for key markers of different phases of endochondral ossification.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIV | Pages 107 - 107
1 Oct 2012
Vrtovec T Janssen M Pernuš F Castelein R Viergever M
Full Access

Pelvic incidence is as a key factor for sagittal balance regulation that describes the anatomical configuration of the pelvis. The sagittal alignment of the pelvis is usually evaluated in two-dimensional (2D) sagittal radiographs in standing position by pelvic parameters of sacral slope, pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence (PI). However, the angle of PI remains constant for an arbitrary subject position and orientation, and can be therefore compared among subjects in standing, sitting or supine position. Such properties also enable the measurement of PI in three-dimensional (3D) images, commonly acquired in supine position. The purpose of this study is to analyse the sagittal alignment of the pelvis in terms of PI in 3D computed tomography (CT) images.

A computerised method based on image processing techniques was developed to determine the anatomical references, required to measure PI, i.e. the centre of the left femoral head, the centre of the right femoral, the centre of the sacral endplate, and the inclination of the sacral endplate. First, three initialisation points were manually selected in 3D at the approximate location of the left femoral head, right femoral head and L5 vertebral body. The computerised method then determined the exact centres of the femoral heads in 3D from the spheres that best fit to the 3D edges of the femoral heads. The exact centre of the sacral endplate in 3D was determined by locating the sacral endplate below the L5 vertebral body and finding the midpoint of the lines between the anterior and posterior edge, and between the left and right edge of the endplate. The exact inclination of the sacral endplate in 3D was determined from the plane that best fit to the endplate. Multiplanar 3D image reformation was applied to obtain the superposition of the femoral heads in the sagittal view, so that the hip axis was observed as a straight not inclined line and all anatomical structures were completely in line with the hip axis. Finally, PI was automatically measured as the angle between the line orthogonal to the inclination of the sacral endplate and the line connecting the centre of the sacral endplate with the hip axis.

The method was applied to axially reconstructed CT scans of 426 subjects (age 0–89 years, pixel size 0.4–1.0 mm, slice thickness 3.0–4.0 mm). Thirteen subjects were excluded due to lumbar spine trauma and presence of the sixth lumbar segment. For the remaining subjects, the computerised measurements were visually assessed for errors, which occurred due to low CT image quality, low image intensity of bone structures, or other factors affecting the determination of the anatomical references. The erroneous or ambiguous results were detected for 43 subjects, which were excluded from further analysis. For the final cohort of 370 subjects, statistical analysis was performed for the obtained PI. The resulting mean PI ± standard deviation was equal to 46.6 ± 9.2 degrees for males (N = 189, age 39.7 ± 20.3 years), 47.6 ± 10.7 degrees for females (N = 181, age 43.4 ± 19.9 years), and 47.1 ± 10.0 degrees for both genders (N = 370, age 41.5 ± 20.1 years). Correlation analysis yielded relatively low but statistically significant correlation between PI and age, with the correlation coefficient r = 0.20 (p < 0.005) for males, r = 0.32 (p < 0.0001) for females, and r = 0.27 (p < 0.0001) for both genders. No statistically significant differences (p = 0.357) were found between PI for male and female subjects.

This is the first study that evaluates the sagittal alignment of the pelvis in terms of PI completely in 3D. Studies that measured PI manually from 2D sagittal radiographs reported normative PI in adult population of 52 ± 10 degrees, 53 ± 8 degrees and 51 ± 9 degrees for 25 normal subjects aged 21–40, 41–60, and over 60 years, respectively [3], and 52 ± 5 degrees for a cohort of 160 normal subjects [4]. The PI of 47 ± 10 degrees obtained in our study is lower than the reported normative values, which indicates that radiographic measurements may overestimate the actual PI. Radiographic measurements are biased by the projective nature of X-ray image acquisition, as it is usually impossible to obtain the superposition of the two femoral heads. The midpoint of the line connecting the centres of femoral heads in 2D is therefore considered to be the reference point on the hip axis, moreover, the inclination of the sacral endplate in the sagittal plane is biased by its architecture and inclination in the coronal plane. On the other hand, the measurements in the present study were obtained by applying a computerized method to CT images that determined the exact anatomical references in 3D. Perfect sagittal views were generated by multiplanar reformation, which aligned the centres of the femoral heads in 3D. The measurement of PI was therefore not biased by acquisition projection or structure orientation, as all anatomical structures were completely in line with the hip axis. Moreover, the range of the PI obtained in every study (standard deviation of around 10 degrees) indicates that the span of PI is relatively large. It can be therefore concluded that an increased or decreased PI may not necessary relate to a spino-pelvic pathology.