Aim: To clarify the issue of whether or not to cement the hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced intra-capsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Method: All patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty between January 1997 and May 1998, in 2 hospitals within the same Deanery, were reviewed. The same prosthesis was used; in hospital A they were uncemented, and in B cemented. There were 121 patients in hospital A and 123 in hospital B; all patients alive at follow-up (50 and 56 respectively) were interviewed for pre-fracture and current assessments of pain and functional ability using validated scoring systems. Follow-up was 32–36 months. Results: Patient demographics were similar. Cemented procedures took 15 minutes longer. In-patient stay was the same. Signiþcantly fewer of the cemented group had been revised or were awaiting revision (p=0.036). There was no difference in mortality rates at any point. Prospective assessment of surviving patients revealed highly statistically signiþcant greater deterioration in pain (p=0.003), walking ability (p=0.002), use of walking aids (p=0.003) and activities of daily living (p=0.009) in the uncemented group. The trend for more dependent accommodation in the uncemented group failed to reach statistical signiþcance (p=0.14). Conclusions: Our þndings support the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

The best management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains undecided. Most are treated by hemiarthroplasty. The aim of this study was to establish whether the advantages of cement outweigh the disadvantages.

All patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with herniarthroplasty between January 1997 and May 1998, in 2 hospitals within the same Deanery, were reviewed. The same prosthesis was used, but in hospital A they were uncemented, and in B cemented. There were 122 patients in hospital A and 123 in B. We conducted a detailed retrospective analysis of hospital notes. All surviving patients (50 and 56 respectively) were interviewed to obtain pre-fracture and current scores of pain, walking ability, use of walking aids, activities of daily living (ADL) and accommodation status, using validated scoring systems. The relative deterioration over the follow-up period (32–36 months) was determined and the groups compared.

Patient demographics confirmed comparability of groups. There was no greater incidence of intra-operative fall in diastolic blood pressure, or oxygen saturation in the cemented group. Cemented procedures were on average 15 minutes longer. Median in-patient stay was the same. Significantly fewer of the cemented group had been revised or were awaiting revision (p=0. 036). There was no difference in mortality rates at any point between surgery and follow-up. Prospective assessment of surviving patients revealed highly statistically significant greater deterioration in pain (p=0. 003), walking ability (p=0. 002), use of walking aids (p=0. 003) and ADL (p=0. 009) in the uncemented group. The trend for more dependent accommodation in the uncemented group failed to reach statistical significance (p=0. 14).

In conclusion, the cemented group faired significantly better than the uncemented group. Our findings suggest the advantages of cement outweigh the disadvantages, and we support the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty for the displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture in the elderly patient.

Introduction: The best method of management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients remains undecided. Most are treated by hemiarthroplasty.

Aim: To clarify the issue of whether or not to use cement in hemiarthroplasty for displaced, intracapsular, femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Methods: Consecutive patients with displaced, intracapsular, femoral neck fractures treated by hemiarthroplasty between January 1997 and May 1998, in two hospitals within one region were reviewed. The same monoblock prosthesis was used; in Hospital A they were uncemented (121 patients), and in Hospital B they were cemented (123 patients). All surviving patients (50 and 56 respectively) were interviewed for assessments of pre-fracture and current pain, walking ability, use of walking aids and activities of daily living (ADL), using validated scoring systems. The average follow-up was 36 months.

Results: The patients’ demographical data were similar (the mean age was 82 and 84 years respectively). There was no greater incidence of intra-operative fall in diastolic blood pressure or oxygen saturation in the cemented group. Cemented procedures took, on average, 15 minutes longer. Fewer of the cemented group had been revised or were awaiting revision (p=0.036). There was no difference in complication or mortality rates at any time between surgery and follow-up (p=0.86). Prospective assessment revealed highly significant differences in favour of cement, in terms of pain (p=0.003), walking ability (p=0.002), use of walking aids (p=0.004) and ADL (p=0.009).

Conclusion: Our findings support the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty for the displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture in the elderly patient.