Despite the increasing interest and subsequent published literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, little is known about the prevalence of its complications and in particular the less common modes of failure. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and to analyse the reasons for it. From a multi-surgeon series (141 surgeons) of 5000 Bimingham hip resurfacings we have analysed the modes, prevalence, gender differences and times to failure of any hip requiring revision surgery.Purpose
Method
Thrust plate prosthesis (TPP) is a bone conserving prosthesis in use for over thirty years. TPP is a stemless and uncemented femoral prosthesis fixed at the lateral femoral cortex with a bolt, plate and screw. This has a metal-on-metal articulation with a 28mm Metasul head and Allofit press fit acetabular cup. Our study aimed to assess the functional outcome of this prosthesis. In our institution 234 TTPs were implanted between 1995 and 2005. All patients completed a self-assessed questionnaire of Harris Hip Score at 2 months, 1 year, and then yearly. Only those who had a follow up was within the last two years were included in the analysis. 76 patients who had failed to satisfy the criteria were excluded. Of the 158 hips in the study 75 hips were in male patients and 83 were in female patients. The median age of patients was 52 years (range 15 to 82). 75 hips were on the right side and 83 on the left. All patients were operated by the senior author or a senior trainee under his supervision (seven hips). Revision of the implant or decision to revise was taken as the end point of our study.Background
Methods
Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in metal on metal bearing. One of the proposed advantages is ease of revision of the femoral component. Short term functional results after femoral revision are similar to those after conventional total hip replacement. Survival and function after revision of the acetabular component only or of both components have not been reported. We aimed to assess hip function and implant survival after revision of the acetabular component for failed Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR). The Oswestry Outcome Centre collected data prospectively on 5000 patients who underwent hip resurfacing between 1997 and 2002. Of these, 182 hips were revised: 42% had revision of the femoral component only, 8% revision of the acetabular component only, and 50% revision of both components. This study analyzed patients who had revision of the acetabular component, either in isolation or in combination with the femoral component.Background
Methods
Simple bone cysts are relatively common in children. When they present to a musculoskeletal oncology unit, they are usually treated by a variety of methods that range from observations following fracture to surgically curettage. The outcome is usually good. Very little is written in the literature regarding adults with a cystic bone lesion. We present 10 consecutive skeletally mature patients who presented with a benign cystic bone lesion. The mean age at diagnosis was 38 years (20–60 years). Three patients has a cyst in the foot, three in the hip, two in the knee, one in the pelvis and the remainder in the shoulder. Full work up, including biopsy, was performed in all cases. All hip lesions required internal fixation for actual or impending fractures. The average follow up was 1.5 years. The surgical outcome was good in all cases. The histological features are similar in all cases. Cementum, as found in Unicameral Bone Cysts, is not seen. This may present a new entity that is not described in the literature.
Thrust plate prosthesis (TPP) is a bone conserving prosthesis in use for over thirty years. TPP is a stemless and uncemented femoral prosthesis fixed at the lateral femoral cortex with a bolt, plate and screw. This has a metal-on-metal articulation with a 28mm Metasul head and Allofit press fit acetabular cup. Our study aimed to assess the survival of this prosthesis. At Oswestry 234 TTP's were implanted between 1995 and 2005. All patients completed a self-assessed questionnaire of Harris Hip Score pre-operatively and post-operatively at 2 months, 1 year, and then yearly. Only those who had a follow up was within the last two years were included in the analysis. 76 patients who had failed to satisfy the criteria were excluded. Of the 158 hips in the study 75 hips were in male patients and 83 were in female patients. The median age of patients was 52 years (range 15 to 82). 75 hips were on the right side and 83 on the left. All patients were operated by the senior author or a senior trainee under his supervision (seven hips). Revision of the implant or decision to revise was taken as the end point of our study. The median time to follow up was 7 years (range 1 to 15). The median pre-operative hip score was 43 (range 3 to 77) which rose to 83 points (range 11 to 100) at the latest follow up. Median hip score in females improved from 39 to 82 points and in males from 52 to 85 points. Twelve patients (5.1%) underwent revision surgery either for infection or aseptic loosening. The Thrust Plate Prosthesis had a good outcome with an increase in hip score of 40 points and 94.9 % survival at a median of 7 years.
