header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 168 - 168
1 May 2012
J. EC P. LS B. RH J. DB
Full Access

Background

Surgical quality improvement has received increasing attention in recent years, yet it isn't clear where orthopaedic surgeons should focus their efforts for the greatest impact on peri-operative safety and quality. We sought to guide these efforts by prioritising orthopaedic procedures according to their relative contribution to overall morbidity, mortality, and excess length of stay.

Methods

We used data from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to identify all patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure between 2005 and 2007 (n=7,970). Patients were assigned to 44 unique procedure groups based on Current Procedural and Terminology codes. We first assessed the relative contribution of each procedure group to overall morbidity and mortality in the first 30 days, and followed with a description of their relative contribution to excess length of stay.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 162 - 162
1 May 2012
D. W J. DB D. P M. W
Full Access

Purpose

There has been recent interest in gender-specific arthroplasty implant design but little evidence to support their use. We hypothesised that outcomes among arthroplasty patients are affected by gender.

Methods

Patients were retrospectively identified from a prospective database of TJRs performed at one centre among six surgeons over a ten-year period (1998-2008). Demographics, pre-operative and 1-year clinical Knee Society (KSS), Harris Hip (HHS), and Oxford scores were collected. Gender differences were analysed using independent samples t-test and chi-square.