Deciding how to allocate scarce surgical resources is a worldwide issue. These decisions are difficult when considering procedures aimed primarily at improving functional quality of life, such as lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) surgery, and procedures perceived as life preserving which also have impacts on physical function, such as coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Comparing functional outcomes of these two procedures may provide further evidence to guide resource allocation decisions. We compared patient-reported functional outcomes following CABG and LEJR surgery using standardised, validated outcome metrics. A retrospective review of prospectively collected pre- and post-operative health related quality of life (SF-36) measures were conducted from 105 patients undergoing elective CABG and 105 elective LEJR surgery patients. Patients were matched based on gender and age.Background
Methods
