The classical longitudinal incision used for the direct anterior approach (DAA) does not follow the relaxation tension lines of the skin and can lead to impaired wound healing and poor scar cosmesis. The purpose of this study was to determine patient functional and radiographic outcomes of a modified skin crease “bikini” incision used for the DAA in THR.

964 patients (51% female; 59% longitudinal, 41% bikini) completed 2 to 4 years after surgery a follow-up questionnaire including the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the University of North Carolina 4P scar scale (UNC4P), and two items for assessing aesthetic appearance and symptoms of numbness. Implant position, rates of radiographic heterotopic ossification and required revision were assessed.

UNC4P total (p<0.001) and OHS (p=0.013) scores were better in the bikini compared the longitudinal group. The proportion of aesthetically very satisfied patients was higher (p<0.001) in the bikini group. The proportion of patients reporting numbness in the scar was higher (p<0.001) in the longitudinal (14.5% versus 7.5%, respectively). Radiographic cup abduction angles, stem position and ectopic ossification rates did not differ between the groups. No differences in the revision rates of both groups being 2.1% in the longitudinal and 1.5% in the Bikini group. Although differences were not huge, Bikini incision resulted in better patient-related outcomes and satisfaction related to the scar. Our study showed that a short oblique “bikini” skin crease incision for the DAA can be performed safely without compromising implant positioning or increasing symptoms suggesting lateral femoral cutaneous nerve dysesthesia. As it is less extensile it should be used after having gained significant experience with the classic longitudinal incision.

Background

Second-generation high-carbon CoCrMo-alloy metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) was introduced in the late 1980s following reports of early loosening, impingement, pronounced wear, and hypersensitivity in the first-generation metal-on-metal articulations. There has been inconsistent data that specifically addresses the clinical performance and longevity of second-generation metal-on-metal THA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of second-generation metal-on-metal primary THA and to assess the influence of demographic factors on implant survival in a large patient cohort.

Physical inactivity is a modifiable lifestyle-related risk factor considered one of the leading causes for the major noncommunicable chronic diseases and relates to approximately 250,000 deaths per year in the United States. While the benefits of physical activity (PA) are many and well-known, qualitative research defining the type and amount of PA in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients that improves health without disproportionally increasing wear and revision rates does unfortunately not exist in the literature. As the basis for future research, this systematic review therefore aimed to identify the different instruments used up to now to quantify PA in TJA patients and to determine how active these patients really are. Within the 26 studies included (n=2460 patients), motion sensors and recall questionnaires were most commonly used. The reported Results were mainly descriptive and research aims and goals varied widely between the studies. We were able to meta-analytically summarize the Results of those studies quantifying PA using pedometers and accelerometers. Patients took a weighted mean of 6,721 steps/day (95% CI: 5,744 to 7,698). Steps per day determined by accelerometers were 2.2 times more than steps assessed by pedometers. Meta-regression demonstrated that walking activity decreased by 90 steps/day (95% CI: −156 to −23) every year of patient age. These summarized Results clearly indicate that TJA patients are less active than recommended to achieve health-enhancing activity levels (currently > 10,000 steps/day), but they are more active than normally assumed in wear-simulations. Hence, such simulator Results have to be interpreted cautiously, taking into account that one million cycles correspond to less than one year in vivo. Future investigations have to evolve more standardization in the assessment and reporting of PA in TJA patients.

During the last decade, outcome assessment in orthopaedic surgery has increasingly focused on patient self-report questionnaires. The Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS and OKS) were developed for the self-assessment of pain and function in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. These scores proved to be reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical change, however, no German version of these useful measures exists. We therefore cross-culturally adapted the OHS and OKS according to the recommended forward/backward translation protocol and assessed the following metric properties of the questionnaires in 105 (OHS) and 100 (OKS) consecutive patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement in our clinic: feasibility (percentage of fully completed questionnaires), reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland and Altman’s limits of agreement), construct validity (correlation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS), and Short Form (SF-)12), floor and ceiling effects, and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, CA). We received 96.6% (OHS) and 91.9% (OKS) fully completed questionnaires. Reliability of both questionnaires was excellent (ICC > 0.90). Bland and Altman’s limits of agreement revealed no significant bias. Correlation coefficients with the other questionnaires ranged from −0.30 (SF-12 Mental Component Scale) to 0.82 (WOMAC) for the OHS, and from −0.22 (SF-12 Mental Component Scale) to −0.77 (ADLS) for the OKS. For both questionnaires, we observed no floor or ceiling effects. The internal consistency was good with a CA of 0.87 for the OHS and 0.83 for the OKS. In conclusion, the German versions of the OHS and OKS are reliable and valid questionnaires for the self-assessment of pain and function in German-speaking patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Considering the present results and the brevity of the measures, we recommend their use in the clinical routine.

The goal of this study was to develop and validate a short, evaluative self-report questionnaire for the clinical self-assessment of patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). If used together with other self-report outcome tools (e.g. generic or physical activity measures), such a short joint-specific questionnaire could avoid an increased burden to the patients and decrease the risk of data loss. All items of the new score (Schulthess Hip Score, SHS) were generated solely on patient perceptions, for item removal we used the clinical severity-importance rating and inter-item correlation methods. The final score consisted of only five items. We then assessed the following metric properties of the SHS in 105 consecutive patients with symptomatic hip OA (mean age, 63.4 ± 11 years, 48 women) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in our clinic: proportion of evaluable questionnaires, reproducibility, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and responsiveness. 97% of the questionnaires were evaluable. Reproducibility of the SHS was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.90; standard error of the measure (SEM) 6.4). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that all items loaded on only 1 factor which accounted for 69.4% of the total variance. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88. Evidence of convergent validity was provided by moderate to high correlations with scores and subscales of the WOMAC (r = 0.58–0.78), Oxford Hip Score (r = 0.78), Harris Hip Score (r = 0.37), SF-12 physical component scale (r = 0.57), UCLA activity scale (r = 0.48), and Tegner score (r = 0.53). Evidence of divergent validity was provided by a lower correlation with the SF-12 mental component scale (r = 0.37). The SHS proved to be responsive with an effect size (ES) of 2.15 and a standard response mean (SRM) of 1.74 six months after THA. Taken together, the results of this study provide evidence to support the use of the five-item self-report SHS in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Considering the brevity of this score, it could be easily used together with other measures such as generic and physical activity assessment tools, without overburdening patients with an inordinate number of items and questions.