Our aim was to assess the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy
in the assessment of the position of the tibial tunnel during reconstruction
of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Between January and June 2009 a total of 31 arthroscopic hamstring
ACL reconstructions were performed. Intra-operative fluoroscopy
was introduced (when available) to verify the position of the guidewire
before tunnel reaming. It was only available for use in 20 cases,
due to other demands on the radiology department. The tourniquet
times were compared between the two groups and all cases where radiological
images lead to re-positioning of the guide wire were recorded. The
secondary outcome involved assessing the tibial interference screw
position measured on post-operative radiographs and comparing with
the known tunnel position as shown on intra-operative fluoroscopic
images.Objectives
Methods
The outcome following arthroscopic anterior cruciate (ACL) reconstruction is dependant on a combination of surgical and non-surgical factors. Technical error is the commonest cause for graft failure, with poor tunnel placement accounting for over 80% of those errors. A routine audit of femoral and tibial tunnel positions following single bundle hamstring arthroscopic ACL reconstruction identified apparent inconsistent positioning of the tibial tunnel in the sagittal plane. Intra-operative fluoroscopy was therefore introduced (when available) to verify tibial guide wire position prior to tunnel reaming. This paper reports a comparison of tibial interference screw position measured on post-operative radiographs with known tunnel position as shown on intra-operative fluoroscopic images in 20 patients undergoing routine primary ACL reconstruction between January and June 2009. Surgery took a mean of 5 minutes longer when intra-operative fluoroscopy was used. In 3/20 patients, fluoroscopy led to re-positioning of the tibial guide wire prior to tunnel reaming. The mean tibial tunnel position as indicated by the tunnel reamer was 41 +/− 2.7 % of the total plateau depth (range 37% to 47%). The mean position projected from the tibial screw on post operative radiographs was 46 +/− 9.2% (range 38% to 76%). A paired t-test showed a significant difference (p = 0.022) between true tunnel position and tibial screw position. 6/20 patients had post operative screw positions that were > 5% more posterior than the known position of the tibial tunnel. The position of the tunnel should be measured at its mid-point where this is evident. On most early radiographic images, the margins of the tunnel are not clear and therefore a line projected from the centre of the screw is used. This audit demonstrates the potential inaccuracy associated with this.
