Retrospective review of four thousand two hundred and fifty-two patients undergoing TJR at a single high-volume arthroplasty centre to determine prevalence and timing of myocardial infarction (MI) following TJR. The incidence of peri-operative MI was 1.5%, with a mean of three days to time of MI. This cohort was comprised of 55% females with a mean age of seventy-five years. We found poor correlation between pre-operative risk assessment using the Modified Multifactorial Index score. Our findings suggest that there is a minimum length of stay compatible with patient safety given the inadequacy of currently available preoperative risk assessment tools.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence and timing of peri-operative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing total joint replacement (TJR).

Despite the pressure toward decreasing length of stay following TJR surgery, we suggest that there is a minimum length of stay compatible with patient safety given the inadequacy of currently available preoperative risk assessment tools.

The prevalence rate of peri-operative MI was 63/4252(1.5%), with a mean time of three days (range 0–18) to MI. Furthermore, there was a predominance of females (55%) and a mean age of seventy-five years among this cohort. We found poor correlation between pre-operative risk assessment using the Modified Multifactorial Index score.

Patients who suffered an acute MI following elective TJR surgery between April 1998 and April 2003 were abstracted from the Hospital CIHI database of four thousand two hundred and fifty-two patients. The role of preoperative risk assessment and risk reduction strategies were also evaluated.

The previously reported rate of MI is 0.3 % and 0.9% following unilateral and bilateral TJR respectively. The reported frequency of MI tends to increase with older age (> 70 yrs) and male gender. There is emerging information that these rates may be grossly under-estimated. Prosthetic arthroplasty is major surgery and regardless of the surgical technique, patients remain at risk for complications.

Historically, cemented THA femoral stems inserted in varus have yielded poor clinical results. Very few studies to date have addressed the question of the effects of varus alignment on uncemented stems. We have conducted a retrospective review of one hundred and twenty-five uncemented THA femoral stems implanted by a single surgeon from 1994 to 1999. Within this single surgeon group we were able to identify sixteen stems implanted in varus and thus proceeded to analyze the effect of varus alignment on functional outcome.

To assess functional and radiographic outcome of uncemented primary THA femoral stems implanted in varus.

After four-years of follow-up, there have been no radiographic or clinical problems associated with implanting uncemented femoral stems in varus.

Although it is not recommended to implant stems in varus, radiographic and clinical problems associated with implanting uncemented femoral stems in varus appear to be non-consequential.

Of the study sample, one hundred and sixteen hips were in neutral alignment as compared to sixteen varus hips. We could not show any significant difference in Harris Hip scores between the varus and non-varus hips (p> 0.5). No cases showed evidence of radiographic loosening, or subsidence (p=0.3) at four-year follow-up.

Retrospective radiographic review of one hundred and twenty-five uncemented primary THA femoral stems implanted by a single surgeon (now retired) from 1994 to 1999, using the Watson-Jones approach, identified sixteen femoral stems implanted in varus. These sixteen stems were matched 1:1 for demographics and preoperative diagnosis to a cohort of sixteen non-varus uncemented stems implanted by the same surgeon over the same study period. Functional outcome included Harris Hip score and range of motion at four-years postoperative. Radiographic signs of loosening and subsidence, defined as > 2mm, were measured. Varus alignment was defined as ≥ 5°. Paired t-tests were conducted on all outcome variables, p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study results suggest there to be no consequence of varus femoral alignment in uncemented stems. Patients will need to be followed for a longer duration to further examine the effects of varus implantation of unce-mented femoral stems.