This paper describes the surgical indications and technique for lateral femoral cutaneous neurectomy in the hip following formation of a neuroma post surgery. We would like to present a single surgeon series of the treatment of localised trochanteric pain post total hip replacement. It is believed that in certain cases localised pain in the line of the scar is attributable to formation of a neuroma of the posterior branch of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh.
Several case reports will highlight the findings on history and examination and the technique used.
The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in 16 cases, and deep sepsis in 13 cases, (12 were done in 2 stages). Others included polyethylene wear in 4 knees, instability in 2, and 1 each of peri-prosthetic fracture, implant breakage and pain of undetermined origin. 3 revisions were performed for failed Link Lubinus patello-femoral replacement. Mean interval between staged procedures for sepsis was 2 months. Reconstruction was performed using the Kinemax Revision system with the use of augments and stems. The modular rotating hinge was used in 4 cases. Surgical exposure included additional lateral release in 7 cases, tibial tubercle osteotomy in 4 and quadriceps snip in one.
At latest review, 7 patients had died due to unrelated causes with a pain free functioning knee prosthesis. Of the remaining 31, 26 patients had none or minimal pain. 21 were independently mobile with a satisfactory range of motion.10 patients needed a walking stick.
This study was undertaken between May 1992 and April 2002 in a hospital where there was a targeted screening programme for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. All data was collected prospectively. 2,578 infants with clinically unstable or at risk hips underwent bilateral hip ultrasound examination. This was performed by the senior author. At risk hips were considered to be those where there was a history of breech presentation, foot deformity, oligohydramnios on prenatal maternal ultrasound scans or a strong family history of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. There were significant changes in the reasons for referral for targeted screening over the ten year period. In the first year of the study 1.5% of referrals were because of oligohydramnios. In the last year of the survey 16.5% of referrals were because of oligohydramnios. The number of referrals for screening because of oligohydramnios increased sixty fold between the first year and last year of the study period. The overall number of infants referred for targeted screening more than doubled between the first and the last year of the study period. Of the infants that were found to have unstable or dislocated hips, no infants had oligohydramnios as a risk factor. The number of referrals for targeted ultrasound screening is increasing. In a targeted screening programme for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip we suggest that oligohydramnios should not be used as a possible risk factor.
Aim: To compare the results of early splintage against delayed splintage with ultrasound surveillance in neonatal hip instability. Methods: Between 1992 and 1997, all unstable hips (Ortolani or Barlow positive) referred by the Paediat-ric Department were seen within 1 to 2 weeks of birth. They were assessed clinically and by static and dynamic ultrasound. Those with proven instability were treated in a Wheaton Pavlick splint. Between 1998 and 1999, with the same assessments made, all hips with proven instability were treated by close surveillance in the form of serial ultrasound and were splinted if there was persistent instability or dysplasia. Any neonate presenting later than 2 weeks was excluded from this study. Results: From 1992 to 1997, 37 neonates were treated with 59 unstable hips. Mean time to splintage was 6.35 days (1-14 days), and mean splintage time was 6.13 weeks (4-11 weeks). All patients in this group developed normally, and no surgical intervention was required. From 1998 to 1999, 11 neonates were treated with 16 unstable hips. 9 hips required splintage after an average of nine weeks. 7 hips stabilised with no splintage. Two hips required surgical intervention, one for ‘late’ dislocation and one for persistent dysplasia. These results show a statistically significant difference for the two treatment groups. (p=0.04, Fishers exact test) Conclusion: We conclude from these results that neonatal hip instability is best treated by splintage within two weeks of birth.
To compare the current practice of ACL reconstruction in a District General Hospital against the recently produced BOA best practice guidelines, we have reviewed all ACL reconstructions performed at our institute from 1997 – 2001. We have assessed the interval from injury to reconstruction and the role of pre-operative assessment and education. We have assessed the standard of documentation regarding the in-patient stay and the surgery itself, including the grade of operating surgeon. Post-operatively, we have assessed the position of the grafts radiologically, and whether original levels of sporting activity were regained. The average time from injury to first consultation in an orthopaedic clinic was 23.6 months. In respect of the admission notes, 77% had the history of injury and symptoms documented, and although all had a general pre-operative cardio-respiratory examination documented, none had evidence of examination of the relevant knee joint. Furthermore, none of the patients had the risks and benefits of the procedure documented at admission, and only one patient had been consented by the operating surgeon. Peri-operatively, all patients received both antibiotics and thromboprophylaxis, although only 21% had daily entries in the notes. The average post-operative follow-up was 9.1 months. From this audit of our current practice, we have highlighted the following points :-
There is still an unacceptable delay in the diagnosis of ACL rupture. Documentation must be improved, with regard to admission examination, daily note entries and recording the findings at EUA. The specific risks and benefits of surgery must be documented either at out-patient assessment or at the time of consent. Consent is not obtained by the operating surgeon.