Fracture fixation has advanced significantly with the introduction of locked plating and minimally invasive surgical techniques. However, healing complications occur in up to 10% of cases, of which a significant portion may be attributed to unfavorable mechanical conditions at the fracture. Moreover, state-of-the-art plates are prone to failure from excessive loading or fatigue. A novel biphasic plating concept has been developed to create reliable mechanical conditions for timely bone healing and simultaneously improve implant strength. The goal of this study was to test the feasibility and investigate the robustness of fracture healing with a biphasic plate in a large animal experiment. Twenty-four sheep underwent a 2mm mid-diaphyseal tibia osteotomy stabilized with either the novel biphasic plate or a control locking plate. Different fracture patterns in terms of defect location and orientation were investigated. Animals were free to fully bear weight during the post-operative period. After 12 weeks, the healing fractures were evaluated for callus formation using micro-computer tomography and strength and stiffness using biomechanical testing. No plate deformation or failures were observed under full weight bearing with the biphasic plate. Osteotomies stabilized with the biphasic plate demonstrated robust callus formation. Torsion tests after plate removal revealed no statistical difference in peak torsion to failure and stiffness for the different fracture patterns stabilized with the biphasic plate. However, the biphasic plate group specimens were 45% stronger (p=0.002) and 48% stiffer (p=0.007) than the controls. The results of this large animal study demonstrate the clinical potential of this novel stabilization concept.
Fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures remains challenging even with state-of-the-art locking plates. Despite the demonstrated biomechanical benefit of screw tip augmentation with bone cement, the clinical findings have remained unclear, potentially as the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the biomechanical benefits of the augmentation options in a humeral locking plate using finite element analysis (FEA). A total of 64 cement augmentation configurations were analyzed using six screws of a locking plate to virtually fix unstable three-part fractures in 24 low-density proximal humerus models under three physiological loading cases (4,608 simulations). The biomechanical benefit of augmentation was evaluated through an established FEA methodology using the average peri-screw bone strain as a validated predictor of cyclic cut-out failure.Aims
Methods
Osteoporotic fracture fixation in the proximal humerus remains a critical challenge. While the biomechanical benefits of screw augmentation with bone cement are established, minimising the cement volume may help control any risk of extravasation and reduce surgical procedure time. Previous experimental studies suggest that it may be sufficient to only augment the screws at the sites of the lowest bone quality. However, adequately testing this hypothesis in vitro is not feasible. This study systematically evaluated the 64 possible strategies for augmenting six screws in the humeral head through finite element simulations to determine the relative biomechanical benefits of each augmentation strategy. Two subjects with varying levels of local bone mineral density were each modeled with a 2-part and 3-part fracture that was stabilised with a PHILOS plate. The biomechanical fixation was evaluated under physiological loads (muscle and joint reaction forces) that correspond to three different motions: 45 degrees abduction, 45 degrees abduction with 45 degrees internal rotation, and 45 degrees flexion.Background
Methods
