Introduction:

With the arrival of the 21^st century, there were clear expectations that cementless fixation in total joint replacements (TJR), and the translational animal protocols for introducing new coatings and surface treatments clinically, had been established. Despite the extensive literature in the 1980s and 1990s demonstrating a translational pathway for predicting skeletal attachment, there remain clinical reports of mechanical implant loosening in both cementless total hip acetabular and total knee components. Before screening a new porous coating or surface treatment, it is important to note that there has been only one experimental translational load-bearing model that has had human (1–3), sheep (4–5), clinical (6–8), and implant retrieval verification confirming skeletal attachment in these types of components, the intracondylar model (1–5,8).

What makes the intracondular model predictive of coating or surface treatments for implant attachment is the ability of the model to replicate the healing response of cancellous bone, the main attachment bone tissue to THR acetabular and TKA implants. A lot of the confusion rests with a lack of understanding of the bone response differences between the intracondylar and transcortical animal models.

The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the intracondylar model can provide positive and negative surface attachment data, whereas, the transcortical model can only provide positive and false positive attachment data.