Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 244 - 244
1 Sep 2012
Jones M Mahmud T Narvani A Hamid I Lewis J Williams A
Full Access

Data was collected on 139 eligible patients a minimum of 18 months post surgery who had had 2 or more ligaments reconstructed. 63 patients were available for clinical follow up. It is the largest single surgeon series studied.

27% of injuries were high energy traffic accidents. 73% were low energy, mainly sports related. 63% of patients were delayed referrals to our unit. Of these nearly 48% had already undergone knee surgery, often more than 6 months post injury. 17% of all cases presented with failed ligament reconstructions. Of those patients followed up 19% were operated upon within 3 weeks of injury, 56% were delayed reconstructions with a mean time to surgery of 21 months and 25% were revision reconstructions. Time to follow up ranged from 18 months to 10 years.

The median KOS ADL, KOS Sports Activity and Lysholm scores for uni-cruciate surgery were all better than those for bi-cruciate surgery. All results were better for acute rather than chronic cases, which in turn were better than those for revision cases. The Tegner score showed that only acute uni-cruciate reconstructions returned to their pre-injury level.

TELOS stress radiographs demonstrated a mean post drawer of 5.9 mm side-to-side difference after reconstructions involving the PCL. IKDC grades showed 6% of knees were normal and 57% were nearly normal.

37% required further surgery, mainly to increase movement or for hardware removal. There was 1 deep infection and 2 cases of thrombosis. There were no vascular complications but 2 had transient nerve injuries.

Multi-ligament surgery can produce good functional outcomes but the knee is never normal. There is an increased risk of PCL laxity post op. Early referral to a specialist unit is suggested as delayed referral to a specialist unit potentially subjects the patient to unnecessary surgery and may affect outcome.