Adequate resection of malignant osseous tumors of the pelvis within wide margins is demanding surgery. To avoid disabling hemipelvectomies, during the seventies of the last century internal hemipelvectomy combined with a partial pelvic replacement had become a new surgical and meanwhile standard procedure. To achieve adequate reconstructions of the osseous pelvis custom-made replacements were recommended. In the very early stages of this type of surgical procedure using megapros-theses, individual pelvic models were manufactured but, until recently, little is known about the accuracy of such models. Thus, it was the aim of this retrospective study to evaluate this.

We analysed the charts of 24 patients (25 pelvic models) for whom an individual model of the osseous pelvis had been constructed to manufacture such a tool and to enable the surgeon a better intraoperative orientation. Two patients refused surgery. Thus, in 23 patients surgical resection of parts of the bony pelvis was performed followed by either a partial pelvic replacement (13 x), hip transposition procedure (5 x), ilio-sacral resection (4 x) or revision surgery (exchange of a partial pelvic replacement).

In all patient who received a partial pelvic replacement, the fit of the replacement was optimal, in none of them a major unplanned resection was necessary. The same was observed in patients who received a hip transposition procedure or an ilio-sacral resection.

Oncologically, in most of the patients we achieved wide resection margins (14 x). In only 5 patients the margins were marginal (4x) or intralesionsal (1 x). In two cases the aim was a palliative resection because of a metastatic disease (1x) or benign entity (1 x).

Thus, pelvic models are helpful tools to planning the manufacture of partial pelvic replacements and ensuring optimal osseous resection of the involved bone. Further attempts have to be made to evaluate the aim of navigational techniques regarding improvement of the accuracy of the osseous and the soft tissue resection.