Muscle stiffness and joint contractures are common complications of limb lengthening. Authors have demonstrated less permanent soft tissue complications with intramedullary lengthening than external fixation. Our aim was to evaluate the joint response following intramedullary femoral lengthening and need for physiotherapy and alteration to rate/rhythm of lengthening. A retrospective review of documentation for all femoral Precice nails in our centre inserted between 2012 and 2017. This involved 98 nails (68 antegrade, 30 retrograde) in 88 patients (59 males, 29 females) with a mean age of 32 years (range 12–69 yrs). We excluded cases where there was no documentation regarding Range of Movement (ROM). Bilateral lengthenings were recorded as separate cases. This left 50 antegrade, 16 retrograde cases with hip ROM data and 55 antegrade, 26 retrograde cases with Knee ROM data.Introduction
Method
The Precice nail is the latest intramedullary lengthening nail with excellent early outcomes. Implant complications have led to modification of the nail design. The aim of this study was to perform a retrieval study of Precice nails following lower limb lengthening. To assess macroscopic and microscopic changes to the implants and assess differences following design modification, with identification of potential surgical, implant and patient risk factors. 15 nails were retrieved from 13 patients following lower limb lengthening. Macroscopic and microscopic surface damage to the nails were identified. Further analysis included radiology and micro-CT prior to sectioning. The internal mechanism was then analysed with Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy to identify corrosion.Introduction
Method
The management of a significant bone defect following excision of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral non-union remains a challenge. Traditional bone transport techniques require prolonged use of an external fixator with associated complications. We present our clinical outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral shortening, stabilised with a deliberately long retrograde intramedullary nail, accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis to restore segment length utilising a temporary monolateral fixator. 9 patients underwent the ‘rail and nail’ technique for the management of femoral non-union. Distraction osteogenesis was commenced on the 6th post-operative day. Proximal locking of the nail and removal of the external fixator was performed approximately one month after length had been restored. Full weight bearing and joint rehabilitation was encouraged throughout. Consolidation was defined by the appearance of 3 from 4 cortices of regenerate on radiographs.Introduction
Method
We present the results of a new non-invasive lengthening nail enabling accurate control of the lengthening process and joint rehabilitation. The use of intramedullary lengthening nails have gained popularity as they reduce common complications associated with external fixators, including infection, joint stiffness, bone regenerate deformity, late fracture and patient implant acceptance. Current nails however are associated with complications including implant breakage, mechanical failure, runaway nail and requiring MUA to restart or obtain segment lengthening. The Precice nail incorporates magnet technology with a hand held device allowing non-invasive lengthening. The nail is also reversible allowing shortening if required. Physiotherapy can continue throughout treatment to maintain joint range of motion without concern of uncontrolled nail runaway. The lengthening is axial reducing shear/torsional forces on the regenerate. The lengthening of 4 femora was undertaken in 3 patients, mean age 34 yrs for post-traumatic shortening and short stature. A standard technique included an Ilizarov corticotomy followed by a 6 day latent period. Patients were mobilised partial weight bearing and knee range of motion maintained. The femora were lengthened one third of a millimetre three times per day. Radiographic and clinical review was performed every 2 weeks.Introduction
Method
On 7 July 2005, four bombs were detonated on the London transport system. Three of these bombs exploded almost simultaneously at 08:50h affecting the underground tube network at Aldgate, King's Cross and Edgware Road stations. The fourth bomb exploded at 09:47h on a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. There were 54 deaths in total at the scenes and over 700 injured. 194 patients were brought to the Royal London Hospital. 167 were assessed in a designated minor injuries unit and discharged on the same day. 27 patients were admitted of whom 7 required ITU care, 1 died in theatre and 1 died post-operatively. The median Injurity Severity Score (ISS) in this group of patients was 6 (range 0-48) and the mean ISS was 12. The general pattern of injury in the critically ill patients was of mangled lower limbs and multiple, severely contaminated fragment wounds. Hepatitis B prophylaxis was administered to those patients with wounds contaminated by foreign biological material. 11 primary limb amputations were performed in 7 patients. 9 limb fasciotomies, 5 laparotomies and 1 sternotomy were carried out. 3 patients had blast lung injury. All patients who underwent primary amputations and debridement received further regular inspections in theatre. These inspections formed the majority of our theatre work. Under no circumstance was initial reconstructive surgery attempted. Delayed primary closure and split skin grafting of all wounds was completed by the end of the second week. There have been no sepsis-related deaths. Our experience at The Royal London has allowed us to revisit the principles of blast wound management in a peacetime setting. A number of lessons were learned regarding communication and resource allocation. A multi-disciplinary approach with the successful execution of a major incident plan is the key to managing an event of this magnitude.
