Corrosion products from modular taper junctions are a potent source of adverse tissue reactions after THR. In an attempt to increase the area of contact and resistance to interface motion in the face of taper mismatches, neck trunnions are often fabricated with threaded surfaces designed to deform upon assembly. However, this may lead to incomplete contact and misalignment of the head on the trunnion, depending upon the geometry and composition of the mating components. In this study we characterized the effect of different femoral head materials on the strength and area of contact of modular taper constructs formed with TiAlV trunnions. Three groups of 36mm femoral heads (CoCr, Biolox ceramic; Oxinium) and matching Ti-6Al-4V rods with 12/14 trunnions were selected for use in this study. The surface of each trunnion was coated with a 20nm layer of gold applied by sputter-coating in vacuo. Each head/trunnion pair was placed in an alignment jig and assembled with a peak axial impaction force of 2000N using a drop tower apparatus. After assembly, each taper was disassembled in a custom apparatus mounted in a mechanical testing machine (Bionix. MTS. After separation of the components, the surface of each trunnion was examined with backscattered electron microscopy to reveal the area of disruption of the original gold-coated surface. Images encompassing the entire surface of the trunnion were collected and quantified by image processing.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Recent advances in materials and manufacturing processes for arthroplasty have allowed fabrication of intricate implant surfaces to facilitate bony attachment. However, refinement and evaluation of these new design strategies is hindered by the cost and complications of animal studies, particularly during early iterations in development process. To address this problem, we have constructed and validated an Cancellous cylindrical bone cores were harvested from bovine metatarsals and divided into five groups under different conditions. After incubation for 4 & 7 weeks, the viability of each bone sample was evaluated using Live-Dead assay and microscopic anatomy of cells were determined using histology stain H&E. Matrix deposits on the scaffolds were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) while its chemical composition was measured using energy-dispersive x–ray spectroscopy (EDX).Background
Methods
