Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for all acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, the efficacy of DAIR and identification of risk factors for failure in patients with late acute PJI, is not well described. Patients diagnosed with late acute PJI between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Late acute PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms (≤ 3 weeks) occurring ≥ 3 months after arthroplasty. Failure was defined as: i) the need for implant removal, ii) infection related death, iii) the need for suppressive antibiotic therapy due to persistent signs of infection and/or iv) relapse or reinfection during follow-up.Aim
Method
The interval between injury and surgery was similar in both groups (<
12 days). Postoperative protocol and rehabilitation was the same in both groups. Full range of motion as tolerated was allowed two week after surgery. Active range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain, strength (Dexter isokinetic testing), patient satisfaction, operative time and elbow radiographs were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. The mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 12–34).
Open arthrolysis (column procedure) trough a lateral (72%) or posterior (28%) approach followed a minimum rehabilitation period of 6 months post original injury. In 8 cases, an anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was required. Patients received postoperative analgesia with Bupivacaine 0,0125% trough an indwelling catheter. No chemical or radiotherapy ectopic calcification prophylaxis was used. Postoperative complications, range of motion, X-ray evaluation, time to return to work, activity level and workers’ compensation were evaluated at the end of follow-up (24 months, range 12–36).
In 20% of cases, patients returned to their previous job with some restrictions (33% disability) and 12% changed to a less physically demanding occupation.
At univariant study of transfusion act, the transfused patients were older (p<
0.001), suffered more infections (p:0.019), more UTI (p:0.003), had lower Hb day 0 (p<
0.001) and POD ï€1(p<
0.001). When analyze the infection, the patients were older (p<
0.001), had higher ASA (p:0.019), lower Hb at day0 (p<
0.026), longer stay (p<
0.001), were more transfused (p:0.019), and received more transfusions (p:0.004). The logistic regression analysis identified only the type of HF, the age and the Hb level (p<
0.05) as independent predictors of transfusion.
The Charnley total hip replacement has had favourable long-term survival results. On the strength of these results orthopaedic companies have introduced “Charnley Copies” incorporating identical design parameters. The objective of the study was to determine whether the acetabular cups provided as DePuy Charnley copies by different manufacturers are identical with regards to their geometry. To analyze how any differences present may affect the motion characteristics of the arthroplasty. A jig was designed which allowed the measurements of: i) range of movement free from impingement, ii) the arc of movement during which the femoral neck is impinging on the cup, iii) point of subluxation and dislocation of the femoral head from the cup. The cups obtained for analysis where the Standard and Long Posterior Wall models of the DePuy Charnley, Aesculap ALFA, Corin Cenator and Avatar LFA. The Aesculap Plasma Symmetrical and Asymmetrical were analyzed for comparison. The Alfa has a greater free range of movement compared to the Charnley cup and the other copies. The Charnley cup, the Cenator and the LFA differed in their pattern of impingement. The Alfa had the earliest point of dislocation. Long Posterior Wall: The Avatar had the greatest free ROM. The Charnley and the Alfa dislocated in an anterior direction latest. The Avatar and Cenator dislocated latest in the posterior direction. Plasma Cup: Compared to the Charnley and its copies its free range of movement was greater, it had only one point of impingement and impinged through the smallest arc before dislocating. It did, however, dislocate easiest. Charnley copies are not identical. Differences in geometry exist and these alter important motion characteristics. Long term outcome may be affected. Surgeons should be aware of these differences when choosing implants.
Cobb and Morrey (1997) reported the use of Total Elbow Replacement (TER) for patients with distal humerus fractures. In this paper, 48% of the patients had a previous history of inflammatory arthropathy. Our aim was to determine the role of TER as treatment for complex distal humeral fractures in elderly patients with no previous history of inflammatory arthropathy. These patients have greater functional demands. The complexity of the original injury was graded according to the AO Mullers’ classification of supracondylar humeral fractures. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically. Their daily activities and general post-operative quality of life was estimated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The Mayo elbow performance score was used for functional evaluation. Implant survivorship was assessed. Fourteen patients (11 female and three male) underwent a Coonrad-Morrey TER via a standard posterior approach for humeral fractures. Their mean age was 73 years (range 61–84 years) at the time of injury. Ten patients had suffered a C3 injury, two a B3 and two an A3 according to the AO classification. The mean time to surgery after their injury was 8 days (range: 1–21 days). Complications: one myocardial infarct and one superficial wound infection. Mean time to follow-up was three years and two months (range: 9–66 months). Nine (64%) reported no pain, four (29%) had mild pain with activity and one had mild pain at rest. The mean arc of extension-flexion movement was 24°–125°. Supination: mean = 90° (range: 70°–100°). Pronation: mean = 70° (range: 50°–110°). No elbow was unstable. The mean DASH score was 22.6 (range: 0.92–63.3). Zero reflects no disability, 100 reflects most severe disability. The mean Mayo elbow performance score was 90 (range: 80–100). X-rays revealed that all implants were well fixed with no evidence of loosening. One patient had severe hypertrophic bone.