There is an unresolved controversy in the published work about the effect of screws crossing the neuro-central cartilage (NCC) on spinal canal dimension in very young children and in animals. Anterior vertebral body screws with fusion can invade and damage the NCC, especially at the site of screw insertion; however, this finding has never been studied. This study is a retrospective, clinical and radiological analysis of seven consecutive children aged 1–2 years treated with anterior vertebral instrumentation and fusion by downsized rod screw systems. The mean age at time of surgery was 2 years 4 months (range 1 year 9 months to 2 years 10 months). The average follow-up period was 3 years 3 months (2 years 6 months to 4 years 5 months). 16 screws inserted anteriorely were evaluated by a follow-up CT scan. Spinal canals were divided with known anatomical landmarks into right and left hemicanals. The relation of the anterior screws to the NCC and the spinal canal dimension were studied. All clinical and radiological complications were recorded.Introduction
Methods
The change of position of the distal pedicle screws with growing rods in relation to vertebral bodies was described as pedicle screws migration. Pedicle screws are subjected to serial distractive forces pushing them down with every distraction; additionally there is continuous growth of the vertebral bodies during the treatment period. These two factors can affect the change of position of the pedicle screws in relation to the vertebrae during the use of growing rods. To our knowledge, this finding has never been studied, confirmed, or quantified. This is a retrospective review of the radiographs and operative notes of 23 consecutive cases of early-onset scoliosis treated with single growing rods. Age at index surgery ranged from 4 years 2 months to 8 years 9 months, and the number of distractions was four to 11 per patient. Measurements were done on post-index and latest follow-up true lateral radiographs. With optimum initial position of the screws in the pedicle, we calculated the distance between the upper end plate and the pedicle screw (distance superior to the screw [SS]) and the distance between the screw and lower-end plate (distance inferior to the screw [IS]). We expressed this ratio as a percentage: SS/IS x 100%. Any increase in this percentage with time denoted a more caudal position; however, a change in the percentage of less than 10% was regarded as insignificant.Introduction
Methods
