Aims: To discover how the management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the young patient (17–25) has changed, if at all, over the past six years.

Methods: The same postal questionnaire was used in 2003 and 2009, sent out to 164 members of British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions were asked about the initial reduction, investigation undertaken, timing of any surgery, preferred stabilization procedure, arthroscopic or open, detail of surgical technique, period of immobilization and rehabilitation programme instigated in first-time and recurrent traumatic dislocators.

Summary of Results: The response rate were 92% (n=151) – 2009, 83% (n=131) – 2003 The most likely management of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation in the UK would be:

Reduction under sedation in A& E by the A& E doctor (80% of respondents).

Conclusions: There has been a remarkable change in practice compared to the previous survey. A significant proportion of Orthopaedic Surgeons would consider stabilisation in young first time dislocators instead of conservative management. Arthroscopic stabilisation is now the preferred technique compared to open stabilisation whenever possible. Surgeons are using more investigations prior to listing the patient for surgery namely the MR arthrogram. There is also an increased use of bio-degradable anchors as compared to metallic bone anchors in 2003.

We aim to identify any changes in the demographics of ACL injured patients over the last decade. Over a twelve month period, the demographic data from 117 consecutive new patients with ACL injuries attending one consultant’s clinic in 1994 was prospectively recorded. This was then compared with data from a similar cohort of 103 consecutive new ACL injured patients attending the same clinic some twelve years later.

Since 1994, the proportion of women seen with ACL injury doubled from 12% to 25%. The proportion of skiing related injuries trebled from 9% to 28%. The average age at presentation rose by 6.5 years from 26.5 to 33. In 2006, the average age of the skiers was 40 and 72.4% of them were female compared to only 8% of non-skiers.

The population of patients with new ACL injuries has changed significantly over the last twelve years. The average age, proportion of women and number of skiing related injuries have all increased significantly. We speculate that the most likely cause of these changes is the skiing population, which has enlarged and, due to retention of participants, has aged over the period of this study (1). Most skiing injuries are sustained abroad and the vast majority of skiers buy holiday insurance to cover themselves against injury. Yet it is the NHS that ends up footing the bill for any reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation. We propose that if the insurance companies maintained responsibility for their clients’ injuries until a full recovery had been made, the NHS would save millions of pounds.

Aims: To identify any changes in the demographics of ACL injured patients over the last decade.

Methods: Over a twelve month period, the demographic data from 117 consecutive new patients with ACL injuries attending one consultant’s clinic in 1994 was prospectively recorded. This was then compared with data from a similar cohort of 103 consecutive new ACL injured patients attending the same clinic some twelve years later.

Results:

Since 1994, the proportion of women seen with ACL injury doubled from 12% to 25%

Conclusion: The population of patients with new ACL injuries has changed significantly over the last twelve years. The average age, proportion of women and number of skiing related injuries have all increased significantly. We speculate that the most likely cause of these changes is the skiing population, which has enlarged and, due to retention of participants, has aged over the period of this study (1). Most skiing injuries are sustained abroad and the vast majority of skiers buy holiday insurance to cover themselves against injury. Yet it is the NHS that ends up footing the bill for any reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation. We propose that if the insurance companies maintained responsibility for their clients’ injuries until a full recovery had been made, the NHS would save millions of pounds.

A comprehensive postal questionnaire was sent to 164 orthopaedic consultants, all members of the Brit-ish Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions were asked about the initial reduction, investigations undertaken, timing of any surgery, preferred stabilization procedure, arthroscopic or open, detail of surgical technique, period of immobilization and rehabilitation programmes instigated in first-time and recurrent traumatic dislocators. The response rate was 83% (n=136)

The most likely treatment of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation:

It will be reduced under sedation in A& E by the A& E doctor.

On the other hand, 54% of surgeons indicated they would investigate prior to surgery, 16% said their first choice operation would be arthroscopic stabilisation, the number of dislocations normally permitted before surgery ranged from 1 to more than 3, and the period of immobilisation post operation from nil to 6 weeks.

The results reveal a wide variation in practice and no clear consensus on how to best manage these patients. Open stabilisation remains the firm favourite. Does this mean arthroscopic stabilisation is regarded as an experimental procedure?

To discover how traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the young patient (17–25) is managed by shoulder surgeons in the UK.

A comprehensive postal questionnaire was sent to 164 orthopaedic consultants, all members of BESS. Questions were asked about the initial reduction, investigations undertaken, timing of any surgery, preferred stabilization procedure, arthroscopic or open, detail of surgical technique, period of immobilization and rehabilitation programmes instigated in first-time and recur- rent traumatic dislocaters.

The response rate was 82% (n=135)

The most likely treatment of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation:

It will be reduced under sedation in A& E by the A& E doctor.

On the other hand, 54% of surgeons indicated they would investigate prior to surgery, 18% said their first choice operation would be arthroscopic stabilisation, the number of dislocations normally permitted before surgery ranged from 1 to more than 4, and the period of immobilisation post operation from nil to 6 weeks.

We now know how shoulder surgeons in the UK are treating this common injury. The results reveal that in Britain, we do not have a consistent approach, raising many discussion points. Open stabilisation remains the firm favourite. Does this mean arthroscopic stabilisation is regarded as an experimental procedure?