Background: Ankle fractures in adults are an increasing part of the workload of orthopaedic surgeons today. Stable ankle fractures are usually managed conservatively and followed up in the fracture clinic to identify any later displacement which may lead to the need for surgical treatment. the guidelines for follow up varies from place to place with equally varying outcomes. the aim of this study was to look at the pattern and outcome of follow up of these fractures and also the influence, if any, of serial radiological imaging during this period.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the follow up of patients who were refered to the clinic as stable ankle fractures and who were treated conservatively following their first clinic attendance. the period covered was April 2002 to march 2003 and we also assessed the documentation of medial side tenderness from the casenotes.

Results: 66 patients were identified consisting of 44 Weber A, 20 Weber B and 2 Weber C fractures with an average follow up of 10weeks. 82% of cases had documented medial side tenderness. None of the Weber A fractures displaced, irrespective of weight bearing instructions and medial side tenderness. Only 2(10%) of the Weber B and 1 (50%) of the Weber C fractures required surgical intervention due to displacement detected after clinic review at week one.

Conclusion: Weber A fractures are inherently stable injuries, do not displace over time and hence do not require further clinic attendances and xrays after the first consultation. Beyond the first week, regular clinic reviews and serial xrays are not necessary in the treatment of Weber B ankle fractures. The presence of medial side tenderness was a poor indicator for joint instability in this series. with proper protocols in place, these can lead to a significant decrease in the workload of orthopaedics surgeons.