Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) refers to a spectrum of anatomical abnormalities. Despite various screening programs, delayed diagnosis still occurs. Delayed cases are more difficult to treat and can have poorer outcomes. Rural address, low socioeconomic status, and ethnicity have recently been associated with late presentation. The objectives of this study were to examine the incidence of DDH, as well as factors associated with delayed presentation in Saskatchewan. Retrospective review of paediatric orthopaedic records from the tertiary referral centre in Saskatchewan was completed from 2008–2014. Variables collected included age at presentation, sex, birth order, birth presentation, birth complications, laterality, family history of DDH, postal code and treatment. Socioeconomic and geographic indicators were determined from postal code using the 2011 National Household Survey. Population level variables included income, ethnic origin, distance from referral centre and education. Associations were examined with bivariate and multivariate analysis. There were 108 new presentations of DDH; 34 cases presented after age 3 months. Demographic data showed 83.3% of cases were female, 48.1% involved the left hip, 17.2% had a positive family history, 57.1% were first born, and 27.9% were breech. An estimated 5.6% of patients were Aboriginal. The mean age at presentation was 199.7 days. 48% of cases lived in the same city as the referral center. Late presenting cases lived on average 46.19 km farther from the referral centre and had a lower mean population, percent of adults with post-secondary education and income. However, none of these were statistically significant. No significant associations were found within the demographic data. Overall incidence of DDH was not estimated due to few cases from southern areas of the province presenting to the tertiary referral center. The estimated incidence of DDH in the Aboriginal population from our sample was lower than previously reported in the literature. This association may be related to earlier swaddling practices, rather than Aboriginal ethnicity. There was a trend toward lower socioeconomic indicators and an increased distance from the referral centre in cases of late presentation, in keeping with recent literature exploring these factors. This suggests there may be deficits in the current selective screening protocols in North America. The study is limited by the retrospective nature of the research and the population level data obtained for certain variables. Future research to collect prospective individual level data may help elucidate important associations. Also, identifying any additional cases would increase the power to detect significant associations with late presentation, and allow an accurate estimate of overall incidence.
The evolution of operative technology has allowed correction of complex spinal deformities. Neurological deficits following spinal instrumentation is a devastating complication and the risk is especially high in those with complex sagittal and coronal plane deformities. Prior to intraoperative evoked potential monitoring, spinal cord function was tested using the Stagnara Wake up test, typically performed after instrumentation once the desired correction has been achieved. This test is limited as it does not reflect the timeframe in which the problem occurred and it may be dangerous to some patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring allows timely feedback of the effect of instrumentation and curve correction on the spinal cord. Pedicle screws that are malpositioned can result in poor fixation or neuronal injury. Evoked EMG monitoring can aid in accurate placement. A positive EMG response can alert the surgeon to a potential pedicle breech and allow them to reassess the placement of their hardware intraoperatively. The stimulation threshold is affected by the amount of surrounding bone acting as an insulator to electrical conduction and is variable in different regions of the spine. In the non-deformed, lumbar spine stimulation thresholds have been established. Such guidelines have not been well-developed for the thoracic spine, or for severely scoliotic spines. Thus our primary objective was to compare the stimulation threshold of the apical pedicle on the concave side to the stimulation threshold of the pedicles at the upper and lower instrumented levels. Intraoperative EMG stimulation thresholds were done at 192 apical pedicles on the concave side of the deformity and then compared to those thresholds found at 169 terminal level pedicles. Only pedicles for which a stimulation threshold was found were reported and excluded those where a breech was suspected. The lowest stimulation required for an EMG response was documented to a maximum stimulation of 20 mA. The mean threshold at the apex was 16.62 milliamps (mA) compared to 18.25mA at the terminal levels. This was compared with the t-test and showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). In this study we report only the thresholds for the concave side, the pedicle that is most likely to be reduced in size. The threshold for stimulation is reduced compared to those seen at the highest and lowest instrumented level. Most of the apexes are located in the mid-thoracic spine with the highest instrumented levels being in the high thoracic spine and the lowest levels being in the lumbar spine. This study provides preliminary evidence that the apical, concave pedicle has a lower threshold than the end pedicles and one cannot rely on established thresholds from different areas of the spine. The surgeon should be cognisant of these differences when instrumenting at the apical level. Ongoing work is examining the convex apex threshold as well as the relationship between the effect of age and a diagnosis other than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
To examine the effect of lateral spine curvature on somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) compared to normal controls. We hypothesise that patients with AIS will show increased latency in their SSEPs when bending into their curve suggesting that their spinal cord is more sensitive to this increased lateral curvature. Patients were recruited from the paediatric scoliosis clinic in a single centre. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of AIS, age 10–18 years, major thoracic curve measuring greater than 10 degrees on Cobb measurement, and undergoing nonoperative management. Exclusion criteria were: any detectable neurologic deficit, and previous surgery on the brain or spine. SSEP recordings were obtained via stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve with surface electrode and measurement of the cortical response over the scalp. All recordings were performed three times: with the patient in neutral standing and maximum right and left side bending. SSEP recordings show that when AIS subjects bend into their curve, latency slows by an average of 0.5ms. However there was a bimodal distribution with most subjects showing minimal change (3ms). This subset was statistically different from both a control group, and the larger AIS group. There appears to be a subset of patients with AIS who have subclinical spinal cord dysfunction demonstrated by abnormal SSEPs. This may place these patients at slightly higher risk of neurologic injury at the time of surgery.
We undertook a prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled trial of one hundred children treated with either an above or below elbow cast for treatment of closed, distal third forearm fractures requiring reduction. The re-manipulation rate in the below elbow group was 2% (95%CI: 0–11%) compared to 6% (95%CI: 2–15%) in the above elbow group, p=0.62. Above elbow casts do not appear to improve fracture immobilization nor reduce the requirement for re-manipulation in pediatric distal third forearm fractures. Debate exists regarding the benefits of using below elbow casts instead of above elbow casts for maintaining reduction in pediatric distal third forearm fractures. The literature indicates a loss of reduction rate of 14.6% of children treated in an above elbow cast and 2.5% in those treated with a below elbow cast. We undertook a prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled trial of one hundred children treated with either an above or below elbow cast for treatment of closed, distal third forearm fractures requiring reduction. Outcome measures included re-manipulation rate, fracture displacement during cast wear, and cast complications. One hundred patients were suitably enrolled; fifty-four received an above elbow cast, forty-six received a below elbow cast. The two groups were similar in terms of age and gender. The above elbow group contained a higher proportion of both bone fractures (41/54) than the below elbow group (27/46). There were no significant differences between the two cast groups in initial, post-reduction or cast-off fracture angulation; nor any difference in the amount of fracture displacement during cast wear. The number of cast complications was similar between the two groups. The re-manipulation rate in the below elbow group was 2% (95%CI: 0–11%) compared to 6% (95%CI: 2–15%) in the above elbow group, p=0.62. Above elbow casts do not appear to improve fracture immobilization nor reduce the requirement for re-manipulation in pediatric distal third forearm fractures.
