To evaluate the use of cutaneous marking of the sacrum for percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. Iliosacral screw placement is dependent upon spatial perception, multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging, and an appreciation of pelvic anatomy which often makes learning the technique difficult for residents. Cutaneous marking of the sacrum may facilitate iliosacral screw insertion by providing additional cues to the orientation of the sacrum. A cross-over study design was used for placing iliosacral screws in whole cadaver specimens using standardized operative and imaging techniques with and without cutaneous sacral markings. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging and a radio-opaque straight edge were used to trace the lateral profile of the sacrum with a marking pen. Total procedure time and fluoroscopy time were recorded. A total of 14 residents (6 seniors and 8 juniors) each placed two iliosacral screw guide-wires in a total of seven whole cadavers (14 SI joints). Group 1 performed the procedure first with no markings and then with markings. Group 2 performed the procedure first with markings and then without markings. Statistical analysis included T test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, and Signed-Rank Test for Difference (p = 0.05). Participants also reported their opinions on each technique.Purpose
Method
The twelve matte and twelve polished surfaces of hemi-arthroplasties were contaminated with Tremendous suffering is associated with infection following total joint arthroplasty. To reduce infection risk, some surgeons use pulse irrigation prior to wound closure. This practice is based on the assumption that pulse irrigation will more effectively remove adherent bacteria. However, there has been no study of the effectiveness of pulse irrigation in clearing bacteria from prosthetic surfaces. The hypothesis of this study is that pulse irrigation is more effective than bulb irrigation in removing intra-operative bacterial contaminants from prosthetic surfaces. The matte and polished surfaces of hemiarthroplasties were studied separately. Each surface was contaminated with Twelve matte and twelve polished surfaces were examined using both irrigation types with corresponding non-irrigation reference values. Results are expressed as the percentage of contaminant bacteria recovered. The matte finish groups showed median values of 1.46 and 2.88x10−2 while the polished finish groups showed 1.49x10−3 and 2.83x10−6 with bulb and pulse irrigation, respectively. The difference between irrigation types is significant ( Pulse irrigation was more effective than bulb irrigation in removing contaminant bacteria from the prosthetic surfaces studied.
The purpose of this study was to answer the question: what liner preparation will provide the most stable polyethylene – cement interface? Two and 4mm circumferential grooves and meticulous cementing technique can significantly increase the strength of the polyethylene-cement interface. All samples failed at the polyethylene – cement interface. Statistically significant differences were found between the following groups: unmodified vs. 2mm (p=0.005) and 4mm groove (p=0.012) and roughened vs. 4mm groove (p=0.011). Modification of a constrained liner with circumferential grooves may improve the stability of the cement interface enough to make this a more reliable technique in revision hip surgery. Polyethylene was machined into 50mm diameter liners. These were cemented using PMMA into aluminum acetabular shells ensuring a 3mm cement mantle. Lever-out testing was performed on four groups; no modification, random roughening, 2mm and 4mm grooves. When an acetabular component is well fixed/positioned, the option of cementing a constrained liner into the fixed shell is an option. Experience has shown that the most common mode of failure in this technique is the polyethylene-cement interface. Funding: This study was funded by the Division of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan.