Tuberosity ‘avulsion’ fractures to the base of the fifth metatarsal respond well to symptomatic treatment. The purpose of this study was a prospective comparison of clinical and radiological outcome with treatment in a plaster slipper, compared to a tubigrip support.

Ethical approval was obtained and written consent with an information sheet issued at the first fracture clinic appointment. Forty three patients with this fracture were allocated to one of our two treatment groups and followed up at regular intervals over a 12 week period or until they were suitable for discharge. A combined foot score (maximum 100 points) was used at each follow up appointment to measure levels of pain (40 points) and function (60 points). A check radiograph was taken prior to discharge to assess union. A repeated measures analysis was used to assess any difference between the two treatment groups and whether this changed with time.

Results indicated no overall significant difference between the two treatment groups with a mean foot score of 73.5 for the tubigrip group and 80.3 for the plaster slipper group over the entire treatment period. At 2 weeks post injury the plaster group (70.9) had a significantly (p< 0.01) better combined foot score at assessment in comparison to the tubigrip group (54.1).By the 5–8 week stage, the mean combined foot scores had improved and were comparable at 89.5 (tubigrip) and 90 (plaster slipper). Radiographs taken prior to discharge indicated two patients in each treatment group with significant fracture site displacement. One patient remained clinically symptomatic and underwent surgical fixation.

In this small cohort of patients the eventual clinical and radiological outcomes were comparable. During the initial 2 week treatment phase the plaster slipper group recorded a significantly better mean foot score.