Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to compare two types of treatment for fractures of the distal radius with posterior shift: the volar locking plate (c) or mixed multiple pinning (MMP). We conducted a prospective randomised trial.

Material and methods: One hundred ten patients aged over 50 years victims of an articular or extra-articular fracture of the distal radius with posterior shift were included in this study. Mean age was 74 years. Patients were recruited via our emergency unit. After obtaining the written informed consent of the patients, patients were assigned to a treatment group using the nQuery Advisor 6.01 available on the internet, 24 hours/d 7d/7. Patients were treated by one of the two surgical techniques according to the randomisation. Patients were reviewed at 3 and 6 weeks and at 3 and 6 months. The DASH and Herzberg scores were noted and plain x-rays of the wrist (ap and lateral views) were obtained at each visit.

Results: Fifty-two patients were treated with MMP and 50 with VLP. Postoperative anteversion of he radial glenoid was significantly better in patients treated with MMP. At six months, the DASH and Herzberg score were significantly better in the LAP group.

Discussion: MMP allows better anteversion of the glenoid than VLP. However, with MMP there is a risk of over reduction (15% of patients in our series). Treatment with VLP should enable restoration of better radius length with a lesser loss at three months than with MMP. All studies reported, irrespective of the function score used, have found better functional outcome with plating than with pinning.

Conclusion: MMP offers a less costly alternative for the treatment of most all distal fractures of the radius with posterior shift. This option provides quite satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. There is a risk of postoperative defect in reduction or stability with MMP, suggesting surgeons should opt for another technique, VLP for example.