The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome, complications and survival of the three most commonly used surgical reconstructions of the proximal humerus in adult patients after trans-articular tumour resection. Between1985 and 2005 thirty-eight consecutive proximal humeral reconstructions using either, allograft-prosthesis composite (n=10), osteoarticular allograft (n=13) or a modular tumour prosthesis (n=14), were performed in our clinic. Their mean follow-up was ten years (nine months to 25 years). Of these, twenty-seven were disease free at latest follow-up (Mean follow-up 16.8 years) and ten had died of disease (4.2 years). Complications and implant survival with revision surgery as end-point are presented for the total group of patients, functional scores for surviving patients only. The endoprosthetic group presented the smallest complication rate of 21%, compared to 40% in the allograftprosthesis- composite and 62% in the osteoarticular allograft group. Only one revision was performed in the endoprosthetic group, in a case of shoulder instability. Infection after revision (n=3), pseudoarthrosis (n=2), fracture of the allograft (n=3), and shoulder instability (n=4) were major complications of allograft use in general. Kaplan-Meier-analysis showed a significantly better implant survival for the endoprosthetic group (log-rank p=0.002). At final follow-up the MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society scores averaged at; 72% for the allograft-prosthetic-composite (n=7, mean follow-up 19 years), 76% for the osteoarticular allograft (n=3, 16 years), and 77% for the endoprosthetic reconstruction (n=10, 6 years) groups.Method
Results
