Total ankle replacement (TAR) has been used as a surgical intervention for arthritis since the 1970s. However, unlike clinically successful hip and knee replacements, TARs are renowned for extensive contraindications to surgery and high failure rates with an average of 83% survival at 5 years. The majority cite aseptic loosening as the reason for failure. The aim of this study wais to analyse retrieved TARs visually and through interferometry to identify potential the failure mechanisms associated with these devices. Retrieved total ankle replacements (n=11) from consecutive revision surgeries carried out at Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds between August 2012 and January 2014, were collected for study at the University of Leeds, under an NRES approved procedure (09/H1307/60). The bearing surfaces of the samples were visually inspected for evidence of damage and wear. The bearing surfaces between the tibial component and the flat surface of the polyethylene insert were then examined using a scanning white light interferometer (NP Flex, Bruker, USA). It was not possible to characterise the talar bearing surface or the inferior polyethylene surface at this stage through interferometry due to the curvature of the surface. The components were aligned and five sections on each of the surfaces measured. These sections represented; anterior-medial, anterior-lateral, posterior-medial, posterior lateral and central regions of the bearing surfaces. 3D roughness values were recorded, and the mean 3D surface roughness compared between implants. Measurements were taken on the medial and lateral aspects of the bearing surfaces to investigate whether damage was location specific. A coefficient of determination was calculated to assess the relationship between implantation time and surface roughness.Introduction
Methods
Surgical treatment options for osteoarthritis of the first MTPJ include fusion, excision arthroplasty, interposition arthroplasty and replacement arthroplasty. 1 Arthroplasty of the first MTPJ is not a treatment modality that is, as yet, widely accepted. 2,3 although early results are promising. The Toefit-plus (tm) first MTP joint arthroplasty is an uncemented modular hemi or total joint replacement. The aim of this study was to look at the short to medium term outcome of the Toefit-plus(tm) system, performed by a single surgeon in a district general hospital. This was a retrospective study. Information was obtained from a combination of theatre logs and the operating surgeon's records. Any patient who had undergone Toefit -plus(tm) first MTP joint replacement was included. The demographic information was collated and the patients were scored using the AOFAS-IP scoring system and a VAS for pain.Introduction
Methods
Traditionally midshaft clavicle fractures have been treated conservatively. It is recognized that displaced and shortened fractures may be better treated operatively. In particular, patients with greater than 20 mm of shortening and 100 percent displacement have a symptomatic non union rate of 30 percent. The standard technique used previously has been via plate fixation with LC-DCP or DCP. However in the last 5 years intramedullary fixation has been popularized. “Rockwood intramedulary clavicular pin” remedies the past treatment issues including poor blood supply, painful prominent hardware and stress raiser related to removal of metal work.
Revision hip surgery is becoming increasingly common, 300 procedures being performed in 2001 at our institution. In order to achieve a good outcome bone stock needs to be of good quantity frequently necessitating the use of impaction bone grafting using allograft bone. Donor bone may frequently take three months before it becomes available for use due to the stringent screening procedure. Donor patients must have a clean bill of health, swabs taken at the time of surgery must obviously demonstrate no growth and blood samples taken at donation and an interval of three months, free from viral infectious diseases. It is thus easy to see the lag from the time of donation to availability and why, with increasing demand, need for allograft bone is rapidly exceeding supply. We need to look for an alternative supply of human bone allograft. We have compared the harvest of bone at the time of primary total knee replacement with that of the femoral head by both mass and volume. Sixty consecutive patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty were included in the study, and the masses and volume of the femoral heads compared with that of the total bone cuts in knee arthroplasty. The type of knee replacement used was documented as was whether the femoral head had had a bone block removed. It was found that the mass of femoral heads was 81g, that of knee cuts 95g this is a statistically significant difference; the volume of femoral heads 66ml and that of knee cuts 75ml. The volumes of bone available from knee arthroplasty cuts are at least comparable femoral heads obtained using hip replacement and could, perhaps, provide a realistic source of bone allograft.