Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the reasons for patient dissatisfaction after primary TKA.

Method: Primary TKA patients (n=2513) entered into the Ontario Joint Replacement Registry (OJRR) with decision date and one year follow-up data (WOMAC, expectations, satisfaction and willingness to undergo surgery) were analyzed to determine the factors that might be associated with patients who were not satisfied with their total knee replacement.

Results: The majority of patients were satisfied with their TKA (n=1939, 81%), but 169 (7%) were uncertain and 281 (12%) were not satisfied. Pre-operative expectations were important as 89% of patients who did not have their expectations met and 40% who had no expectations were dissatisfied with their TKA. Factors that affected patient satisfaction for their TKA, controlling for age, comorbidity and post-operative complications were better pre-operative WOMAC function scores (p25 point improvement).

Conclusion: In this province-wide study, one in five TKA patients were not satisfied with their surgery at one-year follow-up. It is important that patients, surgeons and healthcare payers recognize significant factors that can lead to patient dissatisfaction and help patients establish realistic expectations prior to undergoing TKA surgery.

812 consecutive patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity were studied to compare the characteristics and outcome of patients who had primary amputations and limb preserving surgery.

Patients with primary amputations were more likely to have metastases at presentation, high-grade tumours, larger tumours and were older.

The most frequent indications for primary amputation were tumour excision which would result in inadequate function and large extracompartmental tumours with composite tissue involvement including major vessels, nerves and bone.

The requirement for primary amputation was a poor prognostic factor independent of tumour grade, tumour size and patients’ age.

To determine if rates of local recurrence and metastasis differ in upper versus lower extremity sarcomas.

Prospectively collected data relating to patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for extremity soft tissue sarcoma between January 1986 and April 1997 were analysed. Local recurrence-free and metastasis-free rates were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential predictive factors were evaluated with the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Of 480 eligible patients, 48 (10. 0%) had a local recurrence and 131 (27. 3%) developed metastases. Median follow-up of survivors was 4. 8 years (0. 1 to 12. 9). There were 139 upper and 341 lower extremity tumours. Upper extremity tumours were more often treated by unplanned excision before referral (89 vs 160, p< 0. 001) and were smaller (6. 0cm vs 9. 3cm, p< 0. 000). Lower extremity tumours were more often deep to or involving the investing fascia (280 vs. 97, p< 0. 003). The distribution of histological types differed in each extremity. Fewer upper extremity tumours were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (98 vs. 289, p< 0. 000).

The 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 82% in the upper and 93% in the lower extremity (p< 0. 002). Local recurrence was predicted by surgical margin status (hazard ratio 3. 16, p< 0. 000) but not extremity (p=0. 127) or unplanned excision before referral (p=0. 868).

The 5-year metastasis-free rate was 82% in the upper and 69% in the lower extremity (p< 0. 013). Metastasis was predicted by high histological grade (hazard ratio 17. 28, p< 0. 000), tumour size in cm (hazard ratio 1. 05, p< 0. 001) and deep location (hazard ratio 1. 93, p< 0. 028) but not by extremity (p=0. 211).

Local recurrence is more frequent after treatment for upper compared with lower extremity sarcomas. Variation in the use of radiotherapy and differences in histological type may be contributory. Metastasis is more frequent after treatment for lower extremity sarcomas because tumours tend to be large and deep.