‘Force-closed’, tapered, polished, collar-less stems, (e.g. C-stem, Exeter), are designed to subside in response to expansion of the cement/bone complex over time. Above a certain threshold, distal migration may predict medium-to-long-term failure of ‘shape-closed’ stems. However, no such threshold exists for ‘force-closed’ stems, and these may continue to migrate after 3 years. We believe that the tendency towards stabilisation 2–3 years postoperatively, could be the best predictor of good long-term performance. Twenty OA patients (12F, mean age 66.6 years) were recruited for primary hip replacement with beaded C-stem femoral components. Tantalum marker beads were injected into the proximal femur, and stems were inserted using CMW1 cement and the latest generation cementing technique via a posterior approach: 17, and a lateral, trochanteric approach: 3. RSA X-ray examinations were performed at 1 week, 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months postoperatively. The UmRSA system was used to measure and analyse the radiographs. At 36M the mean stem centroid subsidence was 1.05 mm and had levelled off to a low rate. The mean internal rotation of 2.5° at 36M had not significantly changed during the final year (p = 0.08). At 36M the mean posterior migration of the stem centroid was 0.54 mm (rate of 0.11 mm/y) and posterior migration of the femoral head was 1.66 mm (rate of 0.25 mm/y). At 36M the mean subsidence rate was very low and the mean posterior migration was about one third of that reported for another RSA study of the C-stem. Although the mean internal rotation was greater than that reported for the Exeter stem, there was no significant change during the final year. These low rates of migration at 3 years are consistent with the good results found in clinical studies of this femoral component.
Above a certain threshold, distal migration may predict medium-to-long-term failure of “shape-closed” (collared, textured) stems. However, no such threshold exists for “force-closed” stems, and these may continue to migrate after 3 years. We believe that the tendency towards stabilisation 2–3 years postoperatively could be the best predictor of good long-term performance.
Introduction: Long-term, aseptic loosening is the central problem for total hip replacements (THR)
Subsidence
0.20 ± 0.12 mm (15)
Internal Rotation
0.89 ± 0.52 deg (14)
Lateral
0.13 ± 0.09 mm (8)
External Rotation
0.16 deg (1)
Medial
0.11 ± 0.09 mm (7)
Valgus Rotation
0.09 ± 0.06 deg (5)
Posterior
0.17 ± 0.12 mm (11)
Varus Rotation
0.23 ± 0.14 deg (10)
Anterior
0.08 ± 0.08 mm (4)
Flexion
0.28 ± 0.15 deg (7)
Extension
0.15 ± 0.09 deg (8)