While multiple factors contribute to the variability of prosthesis placement during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the accuracy of the surgeon's resection planning (positioning of the cutting block) is arguably the most critical. One may postulate that proper training, including enabling the surgeon to passively receive quantitative feedback on the cutting block position, may help him/her improve resection accuracy. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that passive reception of feedback on cutting block position improves the accuracy of the successive TKA resection planning. Five cadaveric knees (tibia and foot only) were studied. After arthrotomy, the tracker of an imageless navigation system (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) was attached to the tibia. A navigated TKA procedure was initiated starting with registration of anatomical landmarks. Four surgeons then positioned the tibial cutting block (without pinning) on each knee using standard extramedullary mechanical instruments. The planned target resection was neutral varus/valgus, 3° posterior slope, and 10mm resection depth referencing the lateral plateau. Each surgeon performed 3 planning trials on each of the 5 knees, removing the cutting block between attempts. The planned resections were measured using an instrumented checker provided with the navigation system, referencing the cutting block. Surgeons were informed of the resection parameters measured by the navigation system after each planning trial. The deviations in resection parameters between the resection target and the cutting block position were calculated for each planning trial. The effect of receiving passive feedback on the accuracy of successive placement of the cutting block was assessed by comparing the deviations between each surgeon's 3 trials on the same cadaver (paired-t test). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.INTRODUCTION
Materials and Methods
The alignment of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is perceived to be one of the most influential factors in determining the long-term outcomes. A contemporary debate exists regarding the choice of the alignment method. As a vast majority of the surgeons support the basis of the mechanical alignment philosophy (MA), others believe in the concept of anatomical alignment theory (AA) to closely match the anatomy of the femur and the tibia of the native knee [1]. This study was intended to evaluate the accuracy of achieving a planned tibial resection target using either the MA or AA methods. Five healthy cadaveric knees (tibia and foot only) were studied. Four surgeons were independently asked to position a tibial cutting block (without pinning) using conventional extramedullary mechanical instrumentation (Exactech LPI instrumentation, Gainesville, FL, USA). Surgeons were asked to target a predefined proximal tibial cut according to MA (Varus= 0°, posterior slope= 3°, resection level= 10 mm) or to AA (Varus= 3°, posterior slope= 6°, resection level= 9 mm). Once the surgeon expressed satisfaction with the achieved position of the tibial cutting block, the planned resection was recorded using an imageless guidance system (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR). Surgeons completed at least three positioning trial for each alignment method on each cadaver. The accuracy and outliers (deviated more than 2°/mm from the target [2]) of resection planning were compared between the MA and AA methods. Statistical significance was defined as p< 0.05.INTRODUCTION
Materials and Methods
