Methods and results

JBI methodology for scoping reviews and an a priori registered protocol (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8PR7A) was followed and AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus and EMBASE databases were searched. Literature published in English between 2002 and 2021 was included.

Forty-nine records were included: 36 primary research studies, 1 systematic review and 12 ‘other’ including narrative and government reports. Primary research predominantly used observational cross-sectional designs (n = 21 studies). Most studies took place in hospitals (n = 13) and laboratories (n = 12). Nurses formed the largest population group (n = 13), with very little research on physiotherapists and other allied health professionals.

Methods and Results

Key informant interviews were conducted with 4 physiotherapy operational leads and 1 manual handling trainer from NHS Grampian. Interviews were transcribed and Framework Analysis was utilised to identify key themes, including challenges, barriers, and facilitators. Following this, two online focus groups were conducted with 7 qualified NHS physiotherapists across the UK. Views of manual handling training varied across specialities, with some finding it comprehensive and adaptable, and others finding it less applicable to patients in their speciality or community setting. Physiotherapist views on fitness for work varied, with some highlighting the necessity of TE to ensure workforce health whilst others considered exercise to be a personal matter. Facilitators to implementation identified by participants were having support from management and a strong justification for the exercise content. Varied work schedules and facilities were identified as barriers to implementation of a work-based TE intervention.

Methods and Results

A descriptive cross-sectional study was completed to explore and quantitatively measure the movement of ten physiotherapists during patient handling, over one working day, in a neurological setting. A wearable 3-dimensional motion analysis system, Xsens (Movella, Henderson, NV), was used to measure physiotherapist movement and postures in the ward setting during patient treatment sessions. The resulting joint angles were reported descriptively and compared against a frequently used ergonomic assessment tool, the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA).

Physiotherapists adopted four main positions during patient handling tasks: 1) kneeling; 2) half-kneeling; 3) standing; and 4) sitting. Eight patient handling tasks were identified and described: 1) Lie-to-sit; 2) sit-to-lie; 3) sit-to-stand; facilitation of 4) upper limb; 5) lower limb; 6) trunk; and 7) standing treatments; and 8) walking facilitation. Kneeling and sitting positions demonstrated greater neck extension and greater lumbosacral flexion during treatments which scores highly with the RULA.

Methods

This project is using Steps 1–4 of the Intervention Mapping (IM) approach to inform the research. Online workshops consisting of people living with chronic pain, third sector representatives, healthcare professionals, and researchers are being used to co-produce the guidance.

Methods:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in standing and bending forward to 30, 45 and 60°, with markers on the skin at L1, L3, L5 and S1. Lumbar spine shape was characterised using statistical shape modelling and participants grouped into ‘curvy’ and ‘straight’ spine sub-groups (N=8). On a separate day participants lifted a box (6–15 kg) from the floor without instruction while Vicon cameras tracked sagittal movement of L1, L3 and L5 skin markers. Sacral angle (to horizontal) was calculated from pelvic markers. Matching markers during MRI and lifting sessions allowed vertebral centroid positions (L1, L3, L5, S1) during lifting to be calculated using custom MATLAB code.

Methods

Positional MRI was used to acquire sagittal images of the lumbar spine in a standing posture in 30 healthy adults. Sacral inclination was measured and active shape modelling used to characterise lumbar spine shape. A two-dimensional model of the lumbar spine was constructed using vertebral centroid positions and a simplified representation of the lumbar extensor muscles. The muscle forces required at each level to produce a follower load were calculated using a force polygon.

Methods

Antenatal data and supine MR images of the lumbar spine were available for 161 children. Shape modelling, using principle components analysis, was performed on mid-sagittal images to quantify different modes of variation in lumbar spine shape. Previously collected measures of spine canal dimensions were analysed.

Methods

The lumbar spine was imaged using a positional MRI with participants (n=30) in 6 postures ranging from extension to full flexion. Active shape modelling was used to identify and quantify ‘modes’ of variation in lumbar spine shape. 3D motion capture analysed participants' motion while lifting a box (6–15 kg, self-selected).

Purpose

To test the hypothesis that fatigue failure limits will be exceeded in the case of a bifid arch, but not in the intact case, when the segment is subjected to complex loading corresponding to normal sporting activities.

Hpothesis

Load is normally transferred across the arch in axial rotation. Bifid arch results in increased strain across the isthmus of the loaded inferior articular process.