Clavicle fractures account for 44–66% of shoulder fractures. Evaluating degree of shortening is important when deciding between operative and non-operative treatment. The clavicle of a skeleton was marked at midpoint and junctions of the thirds along its superior surface. Antero-posterior (AP) and 30-degree upshot radiographs were taken. Images were analysed measuring distance between markers. In both AP and upshot images there were apparent discrepancies between lengths of each third and half. The main differences in apparent length appear in the measurement of the thirds of the clavicle. The AP made the medial third shorter compared to the middle and lateral third, whereas the upshot appeared to make the medial third shorter than the middle third with the lateral third shorter again. This study supports the theory that there is parallax error created by the shape of the clavicle. Middle third fractures account for 80% of fractures and both our AP and upshot images make the middle third appear longer in relation to lateral and medial thirds. This leads us to believe that shortening may be overestimated when measured using AP or upshot images. This leads us to advise caution when using WebPacs tools to measure shortening in clinical decision making.
The use of scoring systems for surveillance of post-operative outcomes is increasing. However, the methodology of this follow-up is not universal. We set out to assess whether a postal Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was sufficient to identify patients who were dissatisfied and wanted further treatment. Of 88 patients who had undergone GlobalCap resurfacing in the previous 5 years, we received a completed postal OSS (Median score 33, Range 5–48) from 80 patients. Those with a score <24 (an agreed threshold for surgery pre-operatively) were brought to clinic for review. The 16 recalled patients (2 males, 14 females; age 58–85) had their OSS repeated, supervised by a clinic nurse, and had a Constant Score and an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score performed. Satisfaction was also questioned. OSS correlated well with the Constant Score (r=0.79) and ASES (r=0.86). However, supervision increased the OSS by an average of 6 points (Mean 13.9 to 19.9) and only three of the patients proved dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Used alone, an unobserved OSS may have limited value for this purpose and the use of comparative pre-operative scores or additional patient-reported outcome measures may be necessary to detect poor outcomes.
Patients using a neutral rotation brace post proximal humerus fracture fixation have improved functional outcome and external rotation of the shoulder compared to patients using a standard polysling. Patients who have proximal humerus fracture fixation with extramedullary plates and screws have a risk of reduced range of movement especially external rotation. Gerber et al showed that the average external rotation after fixation of proximal humeral fractures was 39 degrees in their patient cohort compared to a normal range of 80–100 degrees. This can lead to reduced function and poor patient related outcomes. Geiger et al showed that in a cohort of 28 patients, poor functional outcome was noted in 39.3% with an average Constant-Murley Score of 57.9. Current practice is to utilise a polysling holding the shoulder in internal rotation post-shoulder fixation. Patients usually wear the sling for up to 6 weeks. We believe that this increases the risk of adhesion formation with the shoulder in internal rotation in the shoulder joint. Therefore this can cause loss of external rotation in the shoulder joint. We believe that holding the shoulder in a neutral alignment, with a neutral rotation brace post-fixation, will enable an increased rate of external rotation post-operatively thus improving external rotation and functional outcome There is currently no literature comparing the different slings used post-operatively and we believe that this study would be the first of its kind. It would have a substantial change in the way clinicians manage proximal humeral fractures and will potentially reduce the numbers of re-operations to divide adhesions or perform capsular releases. Secondary benefits include a potential earlier return to full function and work and improved patient satisfaction. Study proposal: Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of the neutral rotation brace compared to the standard, currently used, polysling post proximal humerus fracture fixation. No blinding of either participants or clinicians. Three surgeons utilising similar fixation techniques via the deltopectoral approach and using Philos plate fixation (Synthes Ltd.). Standardised post-operative rehabilitation protocol for all patients. Follow up: clinical review and postal outcomes for 1 year Primary outcomes: Post operative functional outcome scores (Oxford, DASH, EQL) obtained at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 1 year). These will be compared to scores taken pre-operatively. Secondary outcomes: Clinical review at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year with range of movement measurements. Radiographs also taken at 6 weeks and 3 months to assess union. Patient questionnaire at 1 year (with outcome scores) assessing patient return to work, complications and patient satisfaction Inclusion criteria: Proximal humeral fractures requiring operative intervention with extramedullary plate fixation (i.e. fractures displaced by 1cm and/or angulated by 45 degrees or more). Age>18. Exclusion Criteria: Patients having intra-operative findings of complete Pectoralis major rupture or if operative exposure requires complete Pectoralis major tenotomy. (These patients need to be held in internal rotation with a standard polysling to allow healing of the Pectoralis major tendon).
Proximal femoral fractures affect around 60 000 patients annually in the UK. A delay in excess of 48 hours from admission to theatre has been shown to have an adverse effect on mortality, morbidity and length of inpatient stay in this patient group (Hollingworth 1993). We set out to identify the causes and effects of any delay to theatre and make suggestions in order to improve the quality and efficiency of our service. We tracked 224 consecutive patients all admitted with a proximal femoral fracture over an eight month period. We recorded a number of details including whether or not a delay occurred and why, on a session-by-session basis. Of the 214 patients included, 75.7% were considered fit enough for surgery at admission; 83.2% of these suffered some sort of delay to theatre. Only 5.6% of patients (8 in total) were considered fit enough for surgery at admission, suffered a delay to theatre and subsequently became unfit causing a further delay. We were reassured to find that our patients are not suffering a longer than average delay to theatre and that those patients who were waiting longer were not becoming ill as a result. We also found that patients admitted on certain days of the week seemed to wait longer, indicating that certain sub-specialty elective lists were taking up theatre time and exacerbating the delay. We have suggested changes to the theatre rota in order to maximise efficiency and aim to repeat this audit to evaluate the effect of these changes.
