Methods

A case-control radiological study was undertaken comparing 500 healthy knees (250 adults) with a consecutive sample of 710 OA knees (355 adults) undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined for each knee, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types were calculated. WSD was defined as a varus mHKA of < -2° in one limb and a valgus mHKA of > 2° in the contralateral limb. The primary outcome was the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between healthy and OA groups. Secondary outcomes were the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between constitutional varus and valgus CPAK types, and to explore associations between predefined variables and WSD within the OA group.

Methods:

One hundred calibrated full-leg standing radiographs obtained from healthy volunteers were reviewed (fig 1). Distances from the medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle, the adductor tubercle, the fibular head and the proximal center of the knee (CJD) to the virtual prosthetic joint line were determined (fig 3). This prosthetic joint line was created by introducing a virtual distal femoral cutting block with a valgus angle of 6° on the full-leg radiographs.

The adductor ratio was defined as the distance from adductor tubercle to the joint line divided by the femoral width.

The correlation with the femoral width, the CJD and the limb alignment was analysed using linear regression analysis. The accuracy and reliability of the use of the ratio of the distance of the adductor tubercle, the medial epicondyle and the CJD relative to the femoral width to reconstruct the joint line was calculated.