Since 1996 over 400 isolated patellofemoral replacements using the Avon prosthesis have been undertaken in Bristol. As a result of the usually gratifying outcomes seen in patients over 55 years old, the indications for this surgery were soon extended to include the many younger patients who have severely disabling patellofemoral disease. We present results from a prospective cohort study of patients under 55 years of age at the time of surgery. 110 knees in 86 patients (median age 47 years, range 24–54) have been treated with Avon patellofemoral replacement (88 in females and 22 in males). Diagnoses included lateral facet OA (59 knees), patella dislocation (25 knees), trochlear dysplasia (41 knees) and post patellectomy instability (7 knees). 79 knees had undergone previous surgery. 17 knees required additional intra-operative procedures including 11 lateral releases and 2 patella realignments. All patients were assessed pre-operatively and at regular intervals using the Oxford, Bristol and WOMAC scores. All knees were scored preoperative and only one knee has been lost to follow-up due to the patient’s death, which was unrelated to surgery. Post-operative Oxford knee scores have been obtained for 106 knees with follow-up between 8 months and 8 years (mean follow-up 24 months). The mean Oxford score improved from 18 preoperatively to 31 at latest review. Bristol and WOMAC scores showed similar improvements. 16 knees required post-operative additional procedures including 6 lateral releases, 3 patella realignments and 11 revisions. Of the revisions 5 were for progression of tibiofemoral OA but none of these were knees with trochlear dysplasia. Equally good mean scores were seen when comparing patients with the 3 main underlying pathologies (trochlear dysplasia, patellar dislocation and lateral facet OA). At least 37% of the patients studied had pre-existing trochlear dysplasia and the majority of these patients report onset of symptoms, often patellar dislocation, in the first three decades of life. More than 90% of patients were overweight or obese according to their BMI at the time of surgery. Many of this type of patient, with disabling symptoms, wish to “live now”. The short-term improvements are frequently dramatic. As yet there is no suggestion of prosthetic failure. Revision presents little difficulty since minimal bone is resected in the primary proceedure. Radiological deterioration of the tibio femoral joint is seen in some cases of primary OA but not with trochlear dysplasia.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of re-operations performed at this district general hospital on total knee replacements over a period of nine and a half years: we also compare the reasons for re-operation as well as their timing. Total knee replacements performed at this hospital and other centres requiring re-operation involving an open procedure were included in this study (total number =58). Patients were assessed both before and after re-operation using the knee society score. Data was recorded with respect to the type of original pros-thesis, reason for and time to re-operation as well as the nature of the re-operation procedure itself. Pre- and post-operative knee society scores showed a mean improvement of 20 with respect to the function scores and 65 with respect to knee scores. 50% of re-operations were for aseptic loosening with a further 25% each for infection and instability. In conclusion, re-operation for total knee replacement is shown to have had a satisfactory outcome in most cases. The results for revision surgery using a two stage procedure, in the treatment of infected total knee replacements, showed this to be very effective.
