This study presents a series of 64 patients undergoing tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) fusions with a hindfoot nail to compare the times to union and complications comparing use of allograft with no allograft. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing a TTC fusion with a hindfoot nail from a period from 2010 to 2013. A total of 64 patients were collated which were performed by 3 surgeons across two centres. We reviewed the medical notes to determine the complications associated with the procedures and the radiographs to assess the time to clinical/radiological union. A comparison between the patients who had undergone a TTC fusion with allograft versus patients who had not received any allograft was made.Introduction:
Methods:
We report our 10-year experience of post-operative complications of calcaneal fractures treated by internal fixation and attempt to correlate these with previously cited patient risk factors. All calcaneal fractures treated by internal fixation in our Major Trauma Centre between September 2002 and September 2012 were identified. Patient indices (age, gender, smoking status and pre-existing co-morbidities), time to surgery and method of surgery (open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and percutaneous fixation) were recorded. Primary outcome was the incidence of wound infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or re-operation. Statistical analysis through Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon testing and relative risk ratio calculations with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) was performed.Introduction:
Methods:
Calcaneal fractures are rare but debilitating injuries assumed to affect particular demographic sub groups. This study aimed to relate epidemiological factors (age, gender, smoking status and social deprivation scores) to the incidence of calcaneal fractures requiring operative fixation over a 10-year period. Data (age, gender and smoking status) was extracted from a prospective trauma database regarding calcaneal fractures between September 2002 and September 2012. The Rank of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores was collated for each patient and data sub-stratified in 20% centiles. 2010 National Census Data was used to formulate patient subgroups and incidences. Resulting data was subjected to statistical analysis through calculation of relative risk (RR) scores with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).Introduction:
Methods:
