We present our results of cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular stem made of titanium-aluminum-niobium alloy. This implant is used since 1979 with only minor modifications. The design of the femoral component achieves primary stability through precision rasping and press-fit implantation.

Between October 1986 and November 1987, two hundred consecutive patients (208 hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty with this tapered, rectangular stem. In all cases the acetabular component was a threaded cup made of titanium.

At a minimum follow-up of twenty years eighty-seven patients were still alive. Sixty-seven patients (69 hips) were available for clinical and radiographic follow-up. The probability of survival of the stem was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 0.98) and that of the cup was 0.72 (0.62 to 0.80). The probability of survival of both the stem and the acetabular component with revision for any reason as the end point was 0.71 (0.61 to 0.78).

Two stems have been revised due to aseptic loosening. We found various degrees of osteolysis around the acetabular and femoral component (61,7%). At the time of the 20-year follow-up no stem was deemed at risk for loosening.

The key findings of our twenty-year follow-up are the very low rate of revisions of the femoral component and the low rate of distal femoral osteolysis associated with this stem. Our data show that femoral fixation of the stem continues to be secure at a follow-up of twenty years.

Objective: Meniscus regeneration is limited, moreover, loss of meniscal tissue leads to osteoarthritis. A new biomaterial, consisting of hyaluronic acid and polycaprolactone was applied as a meniscus substitute device in a study in sheep.

Methods: 24 sheep received a total medial meniscal replacement. Group SCF (n=12) was treated with a cell free scaffold, Group SCS (n=12) with a scaffold seeded with autologous chondrocytes harvested from the contralateral joints, which served as sham controls (n=12). Further 12 non-operated and 2 menisectomy controls were included in the study.

The animals were sacrificed after 4 months. The implants and joint surfaces were evaluated on a macroscopic (Implant Gross Assessment Score; Gross Assessment of Joints Score) and histological level.

Results: There was no significant difference of the Implant Gross Assessment score between the SCF and SCS groups. All implants showed excellent capsular ingrowth at the periphery. Dislocation, extrusion and tears occurred in part of the specimen due to biomechanical problems caused by soft tissue quality. The mean Gross Assessment of Joint Changes Score of the groups SCF and SCS was not statistically different. Cartilage damage was significantly more severe in joints with implants than in non-operated joints and sham controls, but less pronounced than in menisectomy controls. Histological evaluation showed residual scaffold with an associated foreign body response in all implants. Fibrous tissue was present in all implants, in contrast small foci of cartilaginous differentiation were more common in the cell-seeded constructs.

Discussion: At 4 months regenerative meniscal tissue was present but immature. The present study showed that strong biomechanical scaffold properties are a required to allow guided tissue regeneration and maturation under loading conditions. Cell seeding of the scaffold encourages cartilaginous differentiation. Modification of the scaffold and the cell-seeding technique will be investigated in further studies.