Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Introduction and Aims: Polyethylene wear and associated osteolysis is a major factor limiting arthroplasty longevity. The Duration process has the theoretical advantage of reducing wear. Our aim was to evaluate the wear rate of standard and Duration polyethylene using either metal or zirconia ceramic heads in the Anatomique Benoist Girard II hip system.
Method: Of 510 patients, 258 had appropriate radiographs for wear measurement. There were five bearing-couple groups. Group 1, 73 patients: metal (cobalt chrome) head on standard polyethylene; group 2, 73 patients: metal head on Duration polyethylene; group 3, 21 patients: (HIPed) zirconia ceramic head on standard polyethylene; group 4, 63 patients: HIPed zirconia head on Duration polyethylene; and group 5, 28 patients: non-HIPed zirconia head on standard polyethylene. All patients had 28mm heads. Sequential radiographs – at least one year after surgery and at least two years apart thereafter – were digitally scanned and images were analysed using computer software.
Results: Group 1: metal on standard polyethylene (n=73) – mean linear wear rate of 0.138 mm/yr (range 0.023–0.462 mm/yr). Group 2: metal on Duration polyethylene (n=73) – mean linear wear rate of 0.106 mm/yr (range 0.067–0.405 mm/yr). Group 3: HIPed zirconia heads on standard polyethylene (n=21) – mean linear wear rate of 0.124 mm/yr (range 0.037–0.225 mm/yr). Group 4: HIPed zirconia heads on Duration polyethylene (n=63) – mean linear wear rate of 0.120 mm/yr (range 0.001–0.427 mm/yr). Group 5: non-HIPed zirconia heads on standard polyethylene (n=28) – mean linear wear rate of 0.119 mm/yr (range 0.044–0.0330 mm/yr). Comparison of linear wear rates of standard (group 1) and Duration polyethylene (group 2) bearings with metal heads revealed a difference of statistical significance (p=0.0083), with lower annual wear rates with Duration polyethylene. Further comparison between these two groups revealed a male preponderance in the Duration group (p=0.000001). There was also a statistically significant difference in body weight between these groups, with the Duration group being heavier by a mean of 5.1 kilograms (p=0.05). There was no significant difference in wear rates between standard and Duration polyethylene bearings with HIPed zirconia heads. There was no statistically significant difference in age in our patient groups.
Conclusion: Duration polyethylene has lower linear wear rates when coupled with a cobalt chrome head. This is despite a male preponderance and higher body weight. Wear rates between standard and Duration polyethylene bearings coupled with zirconia heads were not statistically different.