The ankle radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the ankle joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01 mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation [1]. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Ottawa Ankle Rule to attempt to reduce the number of ankle radiographs taken in patients with acute ankle injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives.

A retrospective audit was undertaken. 123 ankle radiograph requests and radiographs taken between May and July 2018 were evaluated. Each ankle radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Ottawa Ankle Rule. The rule states that 1 point(s) indicates radiograph series; (1) malleolar and/or midfoot pain; (1) tenderness over the posterior 6cm or tip of the lateral or medial malleolus (ankle); (1) tenderness over the navicular or the base of the fifth metatarsal (foot); (1) unable to take four steps both immediately and in the emergency department [2]. Patients who score 0 do not need radiograph series. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not.

The clinical audit identified 14 true positives where the Ottawa Ankle Rule scored 1 and the patient had an ankle fracture, and 2 false negatives (sensitivity 88%). There were 81 false positives, and 23 true negatives (specificity 22%). Therefore, a total of 23/123 ankle radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 34.5 days of background radiation. The negative predictive value of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in this audit was 92%.

The low rate of Ottawa rule utilisation may unnecessarily cause patient harm that should be addressed. An educational intervention with physicians combined with integration of the Ottawa rule scoring in ankle radiograph requests is planned with re-audit in 6 months.

The coronal plane lower limb alignment plays an important role in the occurrence and progression in knee osteoarthritis. There have been reports of the valgus knee in patients with unilateral developmental hip dislocation (UDHD) with the relatively small sample size. Besides, few studies have analyzed the lower limb alignment of the contralateral side. The purpose of our study was to identify the coronal plane alignment of both the ipsilateral and the contralateral lower limb in patients with UDHD and find out the difference between patients with Hartofilakidis type II and III.

The radiographic data of all UDHD patients who met the inclusion criteria from March 2011 to February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, including the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA). Besides, the femoral torsion angle was measured on the images of CT scan.

The average HKA was 3.42°(range: −4.3–12.8°) on the affected side, and −2.11°(range: −11.4–5.4°) on the contralateral side (P?0.0001). The valgus lower limb alignment on ipsilateral side was most frequently seen in both Hartofilakidis type II (20cases, 51.3%) and type III groups (25cases, 67.6%), whereas for the contralateral side, the neutral alignment in type II group (27 cases, 69.2%) and varus alignment in type III group (19 cases, 51.4%) were most commonly observed. Both the mLDFA (P?0.001) and aLDFA (P?0.001) of ipsilateral side were significantly smaller than those of contralateral side. The average femoral torsion angle was 37.9°(range: 10.4–64.4°) on the affected side, and 27.1°(range: 9.7–45.5°) on the contralateral side (P?0.001).

In conclusion, UDHD patients may present with lower limb malalignment on both sides. The valgus lower limb alignment is the most common deformity on ipsilateral side, which is caused by increased femoral torsion angle as well as the decreased aLDFA. The patients with Hartofilakidis type III UDHD may be more prone to present varus alignment deformity than those with Hartofilakidis type II on the contralateral side. The lower limb malalignment and deformity of ipsilateral distal femur should be considered during any surgery involving hip, knee or femur.

Functional deficient of the little finger flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS-V) is known to be present in our population. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of the absence of FDS-V function in the Hong Kong Chinese population. The association between FDS-V absence and various variables (age, gender, hand dominance, occupation, smoking status, plamaris longus absence) were evaluated. The effects on the grip power due to FDS-V absence were analyzed. The anatomical variations were studied by cadaveric study. The clinical and anatomical variations were correlated by MRI study.

152 adult Chinese men and women from age 18 to 65 were recruited randomly. Subjects with congenital abnormalities, history of hand injury, history of upper limb surgery or underlying neuromuscular diseases were excluded. This study has 3 different parts. The first part is a clinical survey to determine the prevalence of the absence of FDS-V function by both the standard test and the modified test. The second part is a cadaveric study to determine the anatomical variations of FDS-V tendon by cadaveric dissection. The third part of this study is to correlate the clinical findings with MRI study.

Total 152 subjects were recruited with 51 male and 101 female, average age 37.6. The prevalence of the absence of FDS-V function by the standard test was 40.1% for right hand and 37.5% for left hand (38.8%). The prevalence of the absence of FDS-V function by the modified test was 9.2% on the right hand and 9.9% on the left hand (9.54%). The absence of FDS-V function was found more common to be bilateral than unilateral. This was found that 68.6% were bilateral by the standard test and 61% were bilateral by the modified test. The associations of functional FDS-V absence with various variables were insignificant. The effects of various variables on the grip power were analyzed using the multiple linear regression. Gender was1he only variable that had significant effects on the grip power for both the right and left hand. On either hand, the absence of Palmaris longus tendon and the absence of the FDS-V function had no significant effects on the grip power. Cadaveric study showed that the little finger FDS tendon was present in all 10 cadaveric hands. Abnormal muscle or tendon interconnection was not found. MRI study showed that there was hypoplastic tendon in subjects with absent FDS-V function.

The prevalence of the absence of FDS-V function in the Hong Kong Chinese population was 38.8% by the standard test and 9.54% by the modified test. The absence of little finger FDS function has no significant effects on the functional status as quantified by the grip power. We can postulate that patients with little finger FDS tendon injury can have normal range of motion and hand function if the FDP tendon is intact.