Data from recent AOANJRR shows a higher incidence of acetabular revision for dislocation of THA in uncemented compared to cemented THA (RR 1.59). We hypothesized that a difference in accuracy of component placement may be a factor. We aimed to assess any difference in accuracy between these 2 types of THA.

Patients undergoing navigated THA were prospectively recruited. Choice of uncemented or cemented THA was based on individual surgeon’s routine practice and preference and no adjustments were made for this study. All THAs (Cemented Exeter-21 and uncemented Trident/Secur fit-20) were performed through a posterior approach.

Statistical analysis: the mean and 95% confidence intervals (or median and interquartile range (IQR) for non parametric data) for each measure in both groups. ANOVA and nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test (significance level 5%). Levene’s test for homogeneity, Comparison of frequencies with chi-squared test or Fishers Exact test. Bonferroni correction where necessary.

We demonstrated a significant difference in reproducibility between components. Four of 20 (20%) uncemented cups deviated from the target inclination by 5 degrees or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (p=0.048). Seven of the 20 (35%) of the uncemented cups deviated from the target version by 5 degrees or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (p=0.003). There was a significant difference between the groups with regard to deviation from planned leg length (p< 0.001). Deviation from target leg length of greater than 5mm was found in 36.4% of the uncemented cases as compared to 8.3% of the cemented cases although due to the small numbers this was not statistically significant (p=0.16).

Statistically significant reduced accuracy of cup placement is demonstrated with uncemented compared to cemented implants. It is harder to control implant positioning in uncemented implants than cemented implants.